Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

What is Europe?

By Ioan Voicu - posted Thursday, 12 June 2008


2008 is a cardinal year for Europe. The European Union (EU) is involved in a crucial political and legal debate about its future, as well as in promising negotiations with major regional organisations. However, in this important process a fundamental question remains largely open: "What is Europe?" The question is far from being new and the answers are far from being perfect and consensual.

One of the most brilliant French minds of the 20th century, Paul Valery, once asked provocatively: "Will Europe become what it is in reality - that is, a little promontory on the continent of Asia? Or will it remain what it seems - that is, the elect portion of the terrestrial globe, the pearl of the sphere, the brain of a vast body?" His cogent questions could not receive a satisfactory reply.

An adequate reply is not available even in the 479 pages of the Treaty of Lisbon, signed in Lisbon on December 13, 2007, by the representatives of the EU 27 member states. This treaty will enter into force on January 1, 2009, provided that 27 instruments of ratification have been deposited. Stephen Loosley, an Australian participant in a debate on European diplomacy, asserted that "The Treaty of Lisbon is perhaps the most important European document to be signed since the Treaty of Westphalia of 1648". History might confirm this estimation.

Advertisement

The treaty provides for the position of "High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy". EU delegations in third countries and at international organisations shall be placed under the authority of the high representative and shall act in close co-operation with EU member-states' diplomatic and consular missions. On that basis, the creation of a comprehensive EU diplomatic corps is being considered. It is aimed at strengthening the EU status as a global player with a clear and distinct voice in relations with its partners.

The EU is the world's biggest trader and biggest donor of assistance to developing countries. During the irreversible process of globalisation, issues such as securing energy, climate change, sustainable development and fighting terrorism demand coherent answers that only the EU as a single legal personality can provide.

Nicolas Sarkozy, president of France, will assume on July 1 this year the EU presidency for six months. While speaking about Europe as a world power, Mr Sarkozy came to the conclusion that the moment has come for the 27 EU members to start addressing the question: "What is Europe?" An important element of the suggested reply indicates that Europe is a civilisation project and that Europe needs a new Renaissance in order to create the psychological, intellectual and moral climate for a rebirth of faith in the future.

A recent article by Kishore Mahbubani, an eminent diplomat and scholar from Singapore, offers a realistic message on the matter from an Asian perspective. In his opinion the image of the EU is that of a paradox: it is both a giant and a dwarf. It stands tall because it has reached one of the peaks of human civilisation and also because of its enormously successful regional co-operation. However, it stands as a political dwarf in responding to the rapidly changing geopolitical environment.

In the Singaporean author's view, Europe has forgotten the lessons of Machiavelli and is only pursuing ostensibly moral policies in Asia. The poor political visibility and performance of the Asia Europe Meeting (Asem) and the too-slow development of the EU's relations with the Association of South-East Asian Nations (Asean) are convincing evidence of the limits of European diplomacy in dealing with global partners and planetary issues.

The causes of this situation are numerous, complex and deeply rooted in universal history. We will focus only on the absence of a dynamic European diplomacy.

Advertisement

A new world actor

American Ambassador John Bolton criticised what he called the EU's proclivity to avoid confronting and actually resolving problems, preferring instead the endless process of diplomatic mastication. The Lisbon Treaty may lead to changing this situation, as it is meant to herald the emergence of a new world actor equipped with the diplomatic tools to give tangibility to its external policy objectives.

In implementing any foreign policy, diplomacy as a specialised profession is of essence. The EU is expected to open its own embassies under an ambitious plan for a European External Action Service (EEAS) in which over 160 EU offices around the world would become embassies. Who should control this vast diplomatic network is a capital issue under active consideration.

In accordance with unofficial data, the EEAS will number between 2,500 to 3,000 persons at its inauguration in January 2009 and is supposed to give greater force and coherence to EU external policy and by way of consequence to its diplomacy. The final shape and form of the EEAS may be established during the French Presidency in late 2008.

Even before the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force, aside from some current internal disagreements the EU has to pass difficult political and diplomatic tests.

It will have to prove, first of all, its ability to correctly read and interpret the Asian challenge. Effective diplomacy has to be premised on a robust sense of political and economic realities. Some very recent American assessments on the matter may prove useful and inspiring. Two well-known American senators, John McCain and Joseph Lieberman, believe that the resurgence of Asia is one of the epochal events of our time. It is a renaissance that is not only transforming the face of this vast region, but throwing open new opportunities for billions of people on both sides of the Pacific to build a safer, more prosperous and freer world.

Under such circumstances, an unequivocal European commitment to Asia is highly needed. The EU should participate more actively in Asian regional organisations. How to deepen the EU's economic partnerships in Asia should be a priority for the EU and its 27 members. Asian dynamism must be seen as an extraordinary incentive to do more. Credibility requires visibility.

The two American senators wrote: "... our position in Asia has been strongest when we have listened to our friends, and when we have worked not only to persuade them that we are right, but been willing to be persuaded that they are right". This observation is fully valid also for Europe-Asia negotiations, as the power to persuade is at the very heart of both bilateral and multilateral diplomacy.

Without passing premature judgments on European diplomacy's capacity to deal fruitfully with Asia, an urgent task can be reminded. China is to host the Asem 7 Summit in Beijing on October 24-25, 2008. Leaders from the 43 Asem member countries, as well as high officials from the Asean Secretariat and the European Commission, will attend this biennial Summit.

Political dialogue, security and economy, education and culture are the three pillars of Asem. Can European diplomacy promote and cement a productive and really strategic partnership between the two continents, leading to meaningful practical results and not only to rhetorical declarations?

More energetic diplomatic efforts are needed from all participants. The multidimensional Asem process demands a more innovative use of this unique and flexible forum as a diplomatic catalyst. A significant contribution to developing a deep and more diversified European-Asian co-operation is an imperative prerequisite for the success of current and future EU diplomacy. It is axiomatic that constructive diplomacy operates through permanent advocacy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in the Bangkok Post on June 1, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Ioan Voicu is a Visiting Professor at Assumption University in Bangkok

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ioan Voicu

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ioan Voicu
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy