Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Interreligious dialogue and multilateral diplomacy

By Ioan Voicu - posted Monday, 30 December 2019


The current world population is 7.8 billion as of December 2019, according to the most recent United Nations estimates.84% are religious adherants.Christianity represents 2.4 billion,Islam 1.9 billion,Hinduism 1.15 billion,Buddhism 521 million,Chinese traditional religions 394 million.To these figures it is necessary to add Secular, Nonreligious, Agnostic/Atheist population representing 1.2 billion.

According to Pew estimates, more than a quarter of the world's countries experienced in recent years a high incidence of conflicts or hostilities motivated by religious intolerance, mob violence related to religion, terrorism, and harassment of people for violating religious codes.

Under such circumstances it is regrettable that mass-media ignored the adoption by consensus by the United Nations General Assembly(UNGA), on December 12, 2019 of a significant resolution entitled Promotion of interreligious and intercultural dialogue, understanding and cooperation for peace initiated by Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation and Thailand.

Advertisement

The content of the resolution was so well negotiated by its initiators that 56 other countries decided to become cosponsors, including Austria, Bangladesh, China, Ecuador, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Peru, Poland, Senegal, Singapore, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and Viet Nam.

It is not the purpose of these lines to analyse in detail the substance of this comprehensive document containing a long preamble and 20 operative paragraphs, but mostly to draw attention to some remarkable findings and appeals whose actuality is obvious during the current local, national and global vulnerabilities.We will do that by respecting the terminology and style of the document itself,while focusing mostly on interreligious dialogue as viewed by diplomats in the largest forum of multilateral diplomacy.

Strong calls for action

On behalf of its 193 members, the UNGA recalled in the preamble its earlier resolution of 25 November 1981, by which it proclaimed the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief,and its resolution of 25 July 2019 on promoting interreligious and intercultural dialogue and tolerance in countering hate speech.

The UNGA noted also the growing importance of interreligious and intercultural dialogue in the context of the global phenomenon of migration, which increases interaction among persons and communities from various traditions, cultures and religions.

Another relevant resolution of 28 May 2019 is also reminded , in which the UNGA decided to designate 22 August as the International Day Commemorating the Victims of Acts of Violence Based on Religion or Belief,as well as a resolution of 25 July 2019, in which it declared 5 April the International Day of Conscience.

Advertisement

After quoting many eloquent examples on the matter, the UNGA recognized the commitment of all religions to peace and the contribution that interreligious and intercultural dialogue among religions, groups and individuals, in particular religious leaders, can make towards an improved awareness and understanding of the common values shared by all humankind.

The UNGA noted in the same context two important documents: the Appeal for Peace, signed by religious leaders during the World Day of Prayer for Peace, held in Assisi, Italy, on 20 September 2016,and the document entitled "Human fraternity for world peace and living together", which was signed by Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahmad al-Tayyib, on 4 February 2019 in Abu Dhabi.

In the operative part of the resolution under consideration the UNGA reaffirms that mutual understanding and interreligious and intercultural dialogue constitute important dimensions of the dialogue among civilizations and of the culture of peace and calls upon Member States to consider, as appropriate and where applicable, interreligious and intercultural dialogue as an important tool in efforts aimed at achieving peace and social stability and the full realization of the Sustainable Development Goals.

In a special paragraph the UNGA condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual or electronic media, social media or any other means.

Having in mind the existing conflicts,the UNGA underlines the importance of moderation as a value within societies for countering violent extremism as and when conducive to terrorism, while respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, and for further contributing to the promotion of interreligious and intercultural dialogue, tolerance, understanding and cooperation, and encourages efforts, as appropriate, to enable voices of moderation to work together in order to build a more secure, inclusive and peaceful world.

A special paragraph is dedicated to the media.The UNGA welcomes the efforts by the media to promote interreligious and intercultural dialogue, encourages the further promotion of dialogue among the media from all cultures and civilizations.

The UNGA acknowledged in the same context the active engagement of the United Nations system with faith-based and cultural organizations and other relevant non-governmental organizations in the promotion of interreligious and intercultural dialogue and in bringing together people of different cultures, religions, faiths or beliefs to discuss common issues and objectives.

A significant acknowledgment was expressed by the UNGA about the important role of civil society, including academia, in fostering interreligious and intercultural dialogue.

In the final part of the resolution the UNGA invited Member States to further promote reconciliation to help to ensure durable peace and sustained development, including by working with faith leaders and communities and through reconciliatory measures and acts of service and by encouraging forgiveness and compassion among individuals.

The resolution ends by requesting the United Nations Secretary-General to report to the UNGA at its seventy-fifth session, in 2020, on its implementation.

While the consideration by diplomats of the resolution summarized above was relatively short in official meetings, due to its earlier detailed examination during informal diplomatic consultations, this document is expected to have a meaningful role in practice. The diplomats who took the floor on behalf of their countries stated that an open, inclusive and transparent approach was used during the negotiation process. As the international community is experiencing a growing trend of xenophobia and religious intolerance,the resolution was described as "more relevant than ever."Interreligious dialogue through engagement of faith leaders, civil society and academia is important for building intellectual and moral solidarity. Meaningful dialogue across cultural and religious identities is not an abstract idea, but a daily reality at the grassroots level between neighbors, families, students and colleagues.

Beyond these opinions expressed by diplomats,there is no doubt that an important role in the implementation of the resolution summarized in the present article belongs to religious leaders.

From this perspective, The Parliament of the World's Religionsdeserves to be mentioned.In 1993, 143 leaders from across the spectrum of the world's religions met in Chicago,USA, under The Global Ethic project. They condemned particularly "aggression and hatred in the name of religion." The participants affirmed that "there is an irrevocable, unconditional norm for all areas of life, for families and communities, for races, nations, and religions. There already exist ancient guidelines for human behavior which are found in the teachings of the religions of the world and which are the condition for a sustainable world order."

During the 1993 meeting it was argued that religions can contribute to world peace only if they reaffirm a three-fold conviction :No peace among the nations without peace among the religions.No peace among the religions without dialogue between the religions.No dialogue between the religions without investigation of the foundations of the religions.

On this basis the Parliament affirmed four directives:Commitment to a culture of non-violence and respect for life.Commitment to a culture of solidarity and a just economic order.Commitment to a culture of tolerance and a life of truthfulness.Commitment to a culture of equal rights and partnership between men and women.

Multilateral diplomacy cannot ignore these commitments and using its first function of negotiation has the permanent duty of finding the most appropriate ways and means to encourage interreligious dialogue. For this purpose, the framework offered by global institutions like the United Nations and UNESCO should be used in a more robust manner.

As recently emphasized by Pope Francis, "In a world sadly marked by civil, regional and international conflicts, social divisions and inequalities, it is essential to undertake a constructive and creative dialogue based on honesty and truth, with the aim of fostering greater fraternal solidarity among individuals and within the global community".

Let's hope that the diplomatic debates on interreligious dialogue at the United Nations in 2020 will be inspired by these humanistic requirements.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Ioan Voicu is a Visiting Professor at Assumption University in Bangkok

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ioan Voicu

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ioan Voicu
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy