Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

UN discrimination against Jews traps Unilever and J Street

By David Singer - posted Wednesday, 28 July 2021


The United Nations (UN) false designation of Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem as the "Occupied Palestinian Territories" (OPT) has seen the sorry spectacle this week of:

  • A multinational corporation – Unilever PIC (Unilever) – discriminating against the sale of ice cream to Jews who live in those areas by its wholly owned subsidiary Ben and Jerry's and
  • A Jewish organisation – J Street – defending Unilever's decision.
Advertisement

The term "Occupied Palestinian Territories" ignores the 1948 Arab-Israeli War that saw every Jew living in those territories prior to 1948 being:

  • driven out and expelled from their homes and businesses by the invading army of Transjordan and
  • prevented from returning to resume life there until the conclusion of the Six Day War in 1967.

Moreover this loaded anti-Jewish term papers over the destruction, damage and vandalizing of Jewish synagogues, cemeteries and properties during the 19 years those areas remained Judenrein.

Had the UN any intellectual honesty in presenting a fair and balanced account of what happened between 1948 and 1967 – it would be calling these territories the "Re-occupied Disputed Territories". Its continuing failure to do so indicates the disturbing anti-Jewish bias that permeates the United Nations and its agencies.

Ben and Jerry's press release headlined "Occupied Palestinian Territory" (below) has clearly influenced Unilever's decision to justify its policy of discriminating against Jews living there -whilst being more than happy to continue selling its ice cream to those Jew-haters who:

  • Forcibly evicted and expelled all the Jews living there between 1948 and 1967
  • Murder and maim Jews living there now on an ongoing basis and are financially rewarded for doing so.
Advertisement

 

Strange values indeed for a multinational organisation to embrace – values that are leading Unilever into growing commercial challenges internationally by those decent enough to not share Unilever's perverse values.

Even more disturbing and reprehensible is this J Street defence of Unilever's anti-Jewish discrimination policy:

 

 

J Street gets it very wrong in relying on false and misleading decades-old UN propaganda when making the following claims:

  • The battleground is not the "Israeli-Palestinian debate" – it is the "Jewish-Arab conflict" - begun 100 years ago with the 1920 San Remo Conference and Treaty of Sevres and still unresolved - when there were no "Israelis" or "Palestinians" – only "Arabs" and "Jews".
  • The "Palestinian people" was not defined until 1964 – a racist and apartheid Arabs-only definition that excludes all non-Arabs and Jews who lived in Palestine after 1917.
  • The "rights and freedom of the Palestinian People" specifically excludedany claim by its sole spokesman – the Palestine Liberation Organisation - to sovereignty in "the West Bank of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan" - or the right to establish a separate State there – in addition to Jordan – which occupies 78% of former Palestine.
  • "Illegal settlements" are "legal" under article 6 of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the UN Charter.

Words do count.

J Street's readiness to defend Unilever's decision is appalling. No self-respecting Jewish organisation espousing "our Jewish values" should ever defend decisions discriminating against Jews.

Israel's Ambassador to the UN – Yehuda Blum –confronted the UN General Assembly and trashed its treatment of the Jewish-Arab conflict on 16 November 1978:

The history of international conflicts, and particularly those with complex historical origins, can only be properly written by objective historians who enjoy complete academic freedom. The practice of writing and rewriting history according to the transient interests of a political body is of course characteristic of certain regimes. It is regrettable that the United Nations has now been drawn into that pattern.

Unilever and J Street have seemingly swallowed the UN's pernicious rewriting of history to justify discrimination against Jews because of where they live.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Author's note: The cartoon - commissioned exclusively for this article - is by Yaakov Kirschen aka "Dry Bones"- one of Israel's foremost political and social commentators - whose cartoons have graced the columns of Israeli and international media publications for decades.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Singer is an Australian Lawyer, a Foundation Member of the International Analyst Network and Convenor of Jordan is Palestine International - an organisation calling for sovereignty of the West Bank and Gaza to be allocated between Israel and Jordan as the two successor States to the Mandate for Palestine. Previous articles written by him can be found at www.jordanispalestine.blogspot.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Singer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy