Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Silence the doctors, harm the children

By Kara Thomas and Andrew McIntyre - posted Wednesday, 25 March 2026


This shift did not occur in isolation. In 2022, both Labor and Coalition governments supported amendments to the National Law governing medical regulation, placing greater emphasis on maintaining "public confidence" in the health system.

Confidence in medicine matters. But confidence manufactured through censorship is not the same as safety. AHPRA becomes the ministry of truth in effect.

When regulatory systems prioritise protecting institutional reputation over examining evidence and outcomes, public confidence becomes an illusion rather than a reflection of genuine patient protection.

Advertisement

When medicine abandons ethics

History teaches us something uncomfortable but essential: medicine is not immune from political capture.

One of the darkest lessons of the twentieth century is that doctors themselves can become instruments of ideology when professional independence is lost. Historical scholarship examining the role of physicians during the Holocaust documents how the medical profession gradually abandoned ethical principles as political doctrine replaced scientific scrutiny and moral responsibility.

It did not begin with atrocities. It began with conformity.

Doctors were encouraged to embrace fashionable "scientific" ideas aligned with political ideology. Professional dissent was discouraged. Ethical objections were marginalised. Physicians were told they were serving a higher social goal.

Sound familiar?

Step by step, medicine stopped asking the most important question in healthcare: Is this truly in the patient's best interests?

Advertisement

Instead, medicine began asking: Is this consistent with state policy?

The consequences were catastrophic.

The historical record shows how physicians moved from healers to participants in programs of sterilisation, euthanasia, and ultimately mass killing, all justified at the time as scientifically and socially necessary.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Kara Thomas is the secretary of the Australian Medical Professionals Society.

Dr McIntyre is a Consultant Gastroenterologist who established and runs a busy day surgery, Buderim Gastroenterology Centre - a place he was unable to enter while vaccine mandates were being enforced by the government.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Kara Thomas
All articles by Andrew McIntyre

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy