Nuclear is the most reliable path to affordable electricity

Political leaders are increasingly prioritizing affordability (without the need for subsidies) as a cornerstone of electricity policy. They are now recognizing that high costs burden households, stifle economic growth, and fuel public discontent in wealthier nations that are providing taxpayer subsidies to support unreliable electricity from wind and solar.

These same political leaders in the wealthier nations are oblivious to the fact that "net-zero" is NOT affordable by the 6 billion living in poverty! Shockingly, 80% of the 8 billion on planet Earth, or more than 6 billion, are living on less than $10/day.

Amid this "worldwide" economic reality backdrop, nuclear energy presents a far superior affordable alternative to unreliable electricity sources like wind and solar. Economically, it makes no sense to abandon working production methods until new ones can replace the existing and future demand. World citizens are facing this reality in higher electricity prices.

The truth about continuous electricity

One cannot compare baseload continuous electricity to intermittent wind and solar on a like-for-like basis. Due to wind and solar being unable to provide continuous electricity, those projects are not investable by the private sector and only exist in the wealthier countries that can afford to subsidize their existence with taxpayer subsidies.

However, electricity from wind and solar are unpredictable and intermittent and cannot be used as baseload without 100% back up., meaning continuous sources like nuclear, coal, or gas must be constructed, manned, and ready to be dispatched when the wind stops or the sun sets. For solar, we can predict nighttime lapses, but wind's unpredictability exacerbates the issue. So, if 1 megawatt of continuous backup is needed for every 1 megawatt of wind or solar, why build the intermittent wind and solar in the first place?

Countries like Germany and Denmark, which led with aggressively subsidized wind and solar projects, now suffer some of Europe's highest prices. This serves as a cautionary tale of a self-inflicted economic disaster that the U.S. can readily avoid. States with high renewable penetration, like California, have seen systemic rises in electricity prices due to full system costs, including that 100% backup requirement. Today, California has the highest electricity cost in America (except for Hawaii).

U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright has been clear about such inefficiencies: "Germany invested half a trillion dollars, more than doubled the capacity of its electricity grid, and today produces 20% less electricity than before that investment, selling it at three times the price." He adds, "We're in the greatest malinvestment in human history ," noting that globally, $10 trillion has yielded only about 6% of electricity from wind and solar, with high penetration driving up prices and prompting mass industry exodus.

It's time for the U.S. to lead with sane electricity policies, unlocking investments in nuclear, coal, and oil & gas. These are the industries that power the modern world that we know today. Nuclear, in particular, provides continuous baseload power with no harmful pollution during operations, positioning it as the clean, reliable cornerstone for a prosperous future.

Nuclear power excels in delivering stable, affordable electricity, operating at high-capacity factors, often over 90%, to generate power continuously, regardless of weather or time of day. This translates to lower long-term costs, as uranium fuel is vastly superior in the amount of output it produces as opposed to other sources.

True Generation IV SMRs, which fit specific criteria including sustainability (effective fuel use and waste minimization), economics (cost advantages and low financial risk), safety and reliability (very low core damage risk and no need for offsite emergency response), and proliferation resistance and physical protection (deterring misuse), are ideally suited for this role. The Department of Energy endorses fast-tracking these technologies as the clean solutions of the future, with systems like the High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR), Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (SFR), and Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) leading the way.

Unlike those unreliable wind and solar sources, nuclear provides stable, baseload power that ensures reliability and long-term cost savings, making it the optimal solution for meeting rapidly escalating electricity needs without compromising economic stability. To policymakers and voters alike, embracing nuclear, particularly advanced Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), offers a long-term path to electricity independence, job creation, prosperity, and a means to bring the 6 billion living in poverty, to join the industrial revolution.

The surge in electricity demand is unprecedented. Tech giants such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta are backing nuclear power while they are constructing massive data centers to power AI advancements, with facilities requiring six to ten times more power than previous generations. These centers demand round-the-clock, uninterrupted electricity. AI workloads cannot tolerate fluctuations or downtime. U.S. electricity consumption could double by 2050, necessitating an around the clock, always-available supply.