Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

China’s PNG focus is clearly aimed at Australia

By Jeffrey Wall - posted Friday, 10 June 2022


By gifting an initial K80 million to the project China has effectively taken out a "mortgage" over it. Even if Australia was interested in helping develop the project China's presence would almost certainly make that impossible. Australia has shown no inclination in getting involved - so far. But my view is it is too late to do so.

The strategic benefit from controlling this project is obvious. China will be able to decide what it's long-term presence consists of - a wharf definitely but also a military base in the future. Australia would be almost powerless to stop that.,,,,,,without direct PNG Government assistance.

There is an immediate benefit from its engagement with the Ihu project for China. Inland from the two townships are vast high quality timber resources....resources that are part developed/exploited.

Advertisement

The road under construction will give significantly greater access to the timber resource - something China will capitalise on. China already takes around 80 per cent of Papua New Guineas log exports - this project will enable Chinese companies take even more.

There is an element of risk for China in this project. It surely depends on Mr Eoe holding his seat in the forthcoming election - something that is not guaranteed in the volatile world of PNG politics. It also depends on securing reliable and affordable power - and that may require the multi-million Kina development of the Purari hydro power project or gaining access to a major gas resource.

If this project is developed, essentially under the patronage of the Chinese Government, it will clearly not be in the Australian strategic interest. It defies comprehension that absolutely zero has been done by DFAT to put forward an alternate proposal to get involved in the project.

The second project that seems to have secured a level of Chinese commitment during the Foreign Minister's visit is one I helped initially expose eighteen months ago - the development of a seafood factory on the island of Daru - easily the closest PNG community closest to Australia. Daru is effectively adjacent to the islands of the Torres Strait which are part of Australia.

The initial proposal came from a Chinese company - and it seemed at the time the PRC Government may not have had a direct involvement. There is no doubt the PRC Embassy encouraged it, but it seemed to be a proposal from a little-known Chinese company.

Even though there has been no official announcement, media reports, which have not been denied, indicate that the Chinese Foreign Minister "offered" $US200 million to help fund the development of a fishing factory and wharf at Daru.

Advertisement

This should come as no surprise. As Australia's relations with China deteriorated China's priority clearly shifted to areas that impact on "the Australian strategic interest". Daru, first and foremost, meets that criterion.

Not only is Daru close to the islands to our north - part of Australia - it is close to a major seaway passage vital to Australia.

I am advised that the fishing areas around Daru are limited. They are currently fished by the people of Daru, and Australians from the islands in Torres Strait and Cale York. There are treaty agreements that enable both Papua New Guinea and Australia to access the sea between the two countries for fishing and other purposes.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jeffrey Wall CSM CBE is a Brisbane Political Consultant and has served as Advisor to the PNG Foreign Minister, Sir Rabbie Namaliu – Prime Minister 1988-1992 and Speaker 1994-1997.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jeffrey Wall

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy