Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Does Australian renewable energy save the earth – or just cost it?

By Geoff Carmody - posted Tuesday, 22 August 2017


It works now because of the fossil-fuelled base-load/peaking supply system in Australia's east coast grid. Electricity prices are high during peak demand and low during the small hours of the night/morning. We can choose when to dispatch high cost peaking supplies and when to use off-peak to recharge the upper dams.

But what happens in our ACT 'nirvana' world of 100% reliance on intermittent renewables?

I assume dispatching power as it's generated is cheaper than dispatching power that has gone through the full renewable energy generation/storage/draw-down/dispatch process. That means 'pumped hydro' systems would be pumping water uphill when the sun is shining strongly or the wind is blowing strongly (so other renewables are available at lowest cost to power the pumps). Such systems would then be competing to use other renewable energy sources when they are in their own generation/storage phases, conflicting with their generation/storage objectives, in our hypothetical 100% renewables world.

Advertisement

Does 100% reliance on intermittent renewables reduce our ability to choose how we match peak supply with peak demand? Do the sun cycle and the weather determine this instead? Does 'pumped hydro's' cost arbitrage rationale shift it from being a peaking power supply complement (as now) towards a more base-load power demand competitor? If so, does that further magnify the generation/storage multiple inherent in 100% reliance on intermittent renewables?

The nuclear option?

Using renewables to deliver base-load power (and even peaking power) will be expensive because of generation/storage requirements to deal with intermittency. Yet Australia is well-endowed with the resources needed for a nuclear power generation industry. It's ideal for base-load energy supply for a start (as in France).

We have no compunction about exporting some of our resources for this purpose to countries that have not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. What ideological, cultural or other cringe prevents us using our resources for our own peaceful, reliable, low-emissions base-load nuclear power generation? To be sure, this will take time, because so far we've chosen not to have a nuclear power industry. If policy is reversed, we might need to import 'nuclear batteries' for a while. (So be it. SA is importing diesel generators to cover summer blackout risks.)

Resolving the power 'trilemma'

The Government says we face an energy policy 'trilemma'. Policy needs to deliver (i) low emissions, (ii) reliable energy, (iii) low-cost energy.

Advertisement

That's three (conflicting) objectives. Do we really only have one instrument – renewable energy – to deliver them? Is that choice immutable? (SA is using brown coal plus diesel as back-up power.) Renewables advocates should consider the arithmetic implicit in the physics: renewables as our only power supply are very expensive.

Nuclear power might get us close to two objectives (low emissions plus reliable energy). Cost probably will still be an issue (but less than for renewables?). Coal could deliver one objective (reliable energy) or maybe two (lower cost, via stop-gap refurbishment of existing plant?). Low emissions plus cheap energy seems too hard now.

If you sweep nuclear energy or coal off the policy table in favour of renewables, achieving these three conflicting objectives with one instrument is numerical nonsense. A blend of energy sources seems the only way to get a compromise outcome in terms of the three objectives, at least pending some new technological breakthrough. As now, putting all one's eggs in the renewables basket scores renewables = 1, plus achievement of any of the three energy policy objectives = 0. Or worse.

We should control what we can control locally (reliability and cost), and persuade others jointly to control what we jointly affect globally (emissions).

We should not foist any Australian emissions reduction targets solely on electricity, a crucial industrial and household input.

Such targets are globally ineffective, at best, anyway.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Geoff Carmody is Director, Geoff Carmody & Associates, a former co-founder of Access Economics, and before that was a senior officer in the Commonwealth Treasury. He favours a national consumption-based climate policy, preferably using a carbon tax to put a price on carbon. He has prepared papers entitled Effective climate change policy: the seven Cs. Paper #1: Some design principles for evaluating greenhouse gas abatement policies. Paper #2: Implementing design principles for effective climate change policy. Paper #3: ETS or carbon tax?

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Geoff Carmody

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy