Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The growing problem called 'ADHD'

By Linda Graham - posted Tuesday, 7 November 2006


So, are teachers responsible for the increase in ADHD diagnosis? Let’s exercise the same caution that we did in the doctor’s office and take another step back to look more closely at the scene of the school.

Teachers are currently being asked to teach to diversity with one hand tied behind their backs. Over the same 15-year period that “hyperactivity” has become part of our common lexicon, education systems have recognised the need for schools to become more inclusive institutions.

Our teachers are now teaching children who would never previously have entered the gates of the local school. For this, they should be commended. Instead, they are insulted with talk of “performance pay”.

Advertisement

Note however that in those same 15 years, public schooling in Australia has also experienced the effects of harsh neo-liberal reforms. Public services such as education and health have been asked to do much more with much less.

Here in Queensland, we have seen what happens when you strip hospital systems of funding. The increase in ADHD diagnosis in Australia is one telling symptom of what happens when you abandon public education: a growing number of children lose out as under-resourced schools and teachers are forced into a funding play-off.

While schools offer learning support services, many children miss out because of the way their difficulties in school are described. In Queensland, a child whose difficulties are described in ADHD diagnostic nomenclature does not qualify for meaningful support. For these children, systems rely on teachers to plug a widening gap. The load is lessened when difficult children are diagnosed with something that qualifies for support funding or when parents oblige the school by shifting the problem to their local pediatrician. Often, the result is a prescription for stimulant medication.

This is a band-aid solution. But … a cheap one!

When Health Minister Tony Abbott announced the inclusion of Ritalin on the PBS, it was described as a “choice” initiative. Parents could now “choose” between brands of stimulant medication for their hyperactive, distractive, impulsive children.

What Abbott neglected to consider is what little choice parents actually have. In reality, parents cannot influence their child’s behaviour beyond the school gate in any other way. Nor can they influence what is happening in the classroom. If teachers are struggling with a range of diverse learning styles and abilities in a class of 30 seven-year-olds, yet being judged by the performance of their students in benchmark tests, then they are forced to seek support by other means.

Advertisement

Support, however, is tied to disability categories. On the ground, this means that teachers are being forced to seek diagnoses for children on the margins. Some children have difficulties that qualify for meaningful support. Many fall out of those neat little boxes - bright, intelligent, forgetful, inquisitive, disruptive children who require more redirection, more explanation, more repetition, more time, more energy, more help.

These are the children who end up in pediatrician’s offices. These are the children whose parents will learn to speak the lexicon of ADHD.

In this way, an ADHD diagnosis functions as an “escape clause”, so society can keep pretending traditional schooling methods and structures are working. Through such a narrow lens, the problem is the child and never the system.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

49 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Linda Graham completed her doctoral study, Schooling Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders: educational systems of formation and the "disorderly" school child at Queensland University of Technology in 2007. Of particular interest was how schooling practices and discourses may be contributing to the increased diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). While at QUT, she contributed to an international review of curriculum and equity commissioned by the South Australian Department of Education & Community Services and chaired by Allan Luke. Linda is now Senior Research Associate in Child & Youth Studies in the Faculty of Education and Social Work at The University of Sydney.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Linda Graham

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Linda Graham
Article Tools
Comment 49 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy