Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Minding our language

By John Töns - posted Wednesday, 12 March 2008

On Monday, February 25, the Advertiser ran a front-page item about the imminent release of a report on languages. The report recommends that all children should have access to learning a second language from kindergarten.

While the report has not exactly dominated the opinion pages, those letters that have been published about it have been predictably scathing: South Australians, at least those whose letters get published, fail to see the merit in students learning a second language.

The report is timely. The Government’s commitment to an education revolution and to revisit the idea of a national curriculum means that a report like this will at least be part of the mix. However, I have my doubts that it will get very far.


Of course I hope I am mistaken. I hope that this is finally the breakthrough for Australian education and that we will at last shake off the dead hand of our past: a past heavily influenced by an Anglo-centric view of education. But I doubt it. In a previous life I wrote many a briefing paper for both state and federal ministers about language education. They were all very well received. Unfortunately that is where the matter ended - I had little evidence that the papers had been read or if read, had been understood.

This report will encounter much the same road blocks. The first tends to be in the form of a challenge: which language?

The answer to the first challenge is that it does not especially matter which language. The purpose of learning a second language is not merely transactional it is cognitive, social and cultural. Few people seem to appreciate that being bilingual (and preferably multilingual) is a cognitive asset.

As a society we value lateral thinking, or to coin a phrase, “thinking outside the square” or if one wanted to be really modern: “blue sky thinking”. We admire individuals who can look at a problem and come up with radically different solutions. A second language assists in developing that skill.

The reason for this is simple: if you are thinking in another language you are already “outside the square”. You are approaching the world from a different perspective.

Doubtful? Two examples may drive this point home. When I was teaching aspiring teachers learning theory I was stuck for a clear example about the relationship between teaching and learning. Approaching the same question from a number of other languages makes the problem much simpler - in some the same verb is used for both learning and teaching and in most one finds that there is virtually no distinction between the two - they are aspects of the one process. This is of course the concept that teachers need to appreciate (and sadly often don’t).


The second example relates to Japanese. Australian business people often remark on the way in which the Japanese will ensure that business cards are distributed at the start of a meeting. Few appreciate the reason for this. Japanese is a very formal language, the mode of address you use depends very much on to whom you are speaking. It is unctuous to be too polite and formal with someone who is a subordinate and it is the height of rudeness not to be sufficiently polite to one’s superiors. A business card that includes one’s role is a useful guide to the sort of courtesy that one needs to extend.

For Australian business people this is quite often a salutary reminder of the fact that Australia’s much vaunted egalitarianism is largely mythical; permission to use the boss’s first name is merely pseudo egalitarian.

So from a linguist’s point of view it does not really matter which language. But in Australia that is a major issue. For example, there are those children who come from non-English speaking backgrounds and very often their parents would like the child to learn the language(s) spoken within the extended family. There is merit in that approach. There are at least 70 languages used in Australia. Yet when it comes to those generations born in Australia they tend to only have some rudimentary passive understanding of these languages - they are a long way away from being genuinely fluent. This is a tremendous resource that Australia is simply allowing to wither.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Töns is President of the Zero Carbon Network a network established to promote clear thinking about the issues associated with climate change. In addition to operating the only zero carbon boarding kennels in South Australia he is also completing a PhD at Flinders University in the area of Global Justice. John is a founding member of a new political party Stop Population Growth Now.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Töns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy