Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Future thinking

By Howard Glenn - posted Monday, 3 March 2008

I rarely go to conferences these days. I just can’t bring myself to fill in the registration forms anymore - it’s a reaction to a misspent youth.

Those of us who experienced the annual meetings of the old Australian Union of Students (which died in ’83) have no fear of what a conference can present: crowded rooms for set-piece theatrics between every shade of political opinion, except mainstream; smoke-filled kitchen cabinet arguments about whether ditching the policy on Palestine would stop the funding of the attacks on the organisation; days of midnight to dawn marathons of passionate debate about a resolution that would have the same impact on the wider world if it were lost as if it were carried. (What did those Carlton pharmacists think we skinny kids were doing with so many diet pills?)

I used to see fellow conference virtuosos appearing at a host of other events: overseas aid council meetings, national homosexual conferences, disarmament conferences, youth summits. The biggest I recall was the Australian nuclear disarmament conference in Melbourne in 1985 - the most productive a small gathering of Philippines support groups in Austinmer to map out an Australian agenda against military aid to Marcos.


But for me, conference fatigue began to set in later in the 80s, when I started work with the newly formed Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, responsible for liaising with non-government human rights groups. I went to an enormous variety of national gatherings of every sort of human rights and social policy group to discuss how their issues could be pursued within a human rights framework.

Sometimes with colleagues, but mostly on my own, I got a full immersion in the culture of complaint. And at the same time, a better understanding of being a fish out of water. The able-bodied person at the disability conference; the Anglo at the ethnic conference, the whitefella at the Aboriginal conference; the childless at the children’s conference.

Lots came out of this work - ideas were developed for disability discrimination legislation, inquiries into racist violence and removal of Aboriginal children, and for the ratification of the convention on the rights of the child. But eventually I was taken off the case - I got to the stage that I couldn’t face another conference. I’d fly to the event, but couldn’t leave my hotel room to collect another plastic name tag and drink another International Roast coffee.

In the 1990s I basically only attended conferences as a guest speaker, or to a accompany a minister or a Board member or an Australian of the Year. In and out. That was achievable.

Or I organised smaller dispersed conferences, in so many locations that only locals could attend. In 1996 and 1997 around Australia Day, dozens of communities hosted “Australia Consults” meetings - discussing the future of the country, reconciliation, a republic and the approaching Centenary of Federation.

But when the Howard government settled in, there was a complete change of mood. I had planned to stay for the whole length of the 1997 national reconciliation convention, but in the first main plenary, the Prime Minister turned his back on the reconciliation process. I gave my speech half heartedly in the following session, then went drinking with everyone else.


Government started to dampen down independent thinking about the future of the country, to slowly roll-out a backward looking agenda, and latterly to play to our fears rather than our hopes.

One of Howard’s first acts was to sack a bold, independent, thinking woman who had just been appointed to lead the Centenary of Federation celebrations and help shape our national identity into the future. There was nothing accidental in these early moves.

The community sector conferences started to take two broad directions - either conservative and oppositional, like how to maintain basic decency, and organise against government initiatives like detention of refugee children and “work choices”. Or some which tried to redefine the community sector into a government agenda - call this social entrepreneurship, not social welfare, just keep giving us the money!

So why am I enthusiastic about a relatively small two-day conference in April? Because it is a big gesture which says clearly that we have permission to start thinking about the future again. The flow-on effects are already starting. Schools want to have their own future summits, difficult long term issues are emerging for community debate. And that’s before it’s all really started.

It’s only two days and 1,000 people. Who gets to go is not as important as the fact that it is occurring at all, and that there’s such media attention to the attendance. Some will see it as a revival of the mythical Keating elites; the start of European-style social planning; a talk fest. I see it as the start of a restoration of confidence in Australian culture, identity and ingenuity, and a faith that we can think about future challenges, and find what we need to face them.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

20 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Howard Glenn leads lobby group Rights Australia Inc, was previously founder and national director of Australians for Just Refugee Programs, and brought the widest range of organisations and individuals together to challenge poor treatment of asylum seekers and refugees.

Formerly CEO of the National Australia Day Council, he was responsible for modernising national celebrations and the Australian of the Year Awards, and involving communities across Australia in debates on reconciliation, republic and national identity.

Howard was an adviser to the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs in the Hawke-Keating Governments, and had key involvement with Indigenous education policy, the response to the deaths in custody Royal Commission and the establishment of the reconciliation process. Outside government he has extensive community sector involvement, currently on human rights, HIV-AIDS, drug and alcohol issues. When not at a computer, Howard is a middle distance runner and a surf lifesaver.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Howard Glenn

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Howard Glenn
Article Tools
Comment 20 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Rights Australia Inc
 Why Australians deserve a right to privacy
 Future thinking
 Refugees and asylum-seekers no threat to our security
 Prosperity with purpose - a fresh approach to some unfinished business
 Reconciliation spirit is vital

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy