Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Toying with new ideas

By Frans Nauta - posted Tuesday, 2 January 2007


Who wouldn't like to have a government that's both as innovative and well managed as companies like Nokia, 3M, Shell, LEGO or Apple?

There is a lot of discussion currently on public sector innovation in many countries, but hardly anyone is willing to look at the way business organises innovation. The standard argument for this neglect is that politics and government are so different from business that it's not useful to transplant business practices to the public sector.

However, I think that we can learn a lot from innovation models from some excellent companies in the world to create a better and faster moving government.

Advertisement

The result could be a government that is more responsive to new ideas, has a professional way to set up experiments and learn from them, is better equiped to turn feedback from citizens into new stuff, gives tools to citizens to create their own stuff and is (much) more fun to work for.

It all starts with a simple assumption: that developing and implementing a new policy is not all that different from an innovation process in a business. Any innovation starts with an inspired idea of a new possibility, be it a solution for an existing problem or a new opportunity altogether.

This applies to government as well as business. The big difference is that business over the past 50 years has developed professional tools to nourish these new ideas, make a tough assessment to select the best, and test them in proof-of-concepts and from there to quickly deliver new products and services to customers.

Let's take a look at Nokia. The Finnish company of mobile phones and networks has an interesting way to generate more than one solution to a problem.

Instead of setting up one team, it will give the assignment to different, multi-disciplinary teams. The teams are in a creative competition with each other, pitching their own solution. It's a perfect way to prevent groupthink and lobbying from special interests within the company.

Anyone who has worked in or around government knows that policy development is easily caught up in groupthink and often frustrated by lobbying from interest groups. Wouldn't it be great if a minister or a cabinet could get three possible solutions instead of one?

Advertisement

Those three would of course be less developed, but they would also be fresh. The classical way brings one solution that is more often than not a heavily compromised proposal. The common denominator has very likely sucked out most of the originality, inspiration and clarity that started of the process.

It would also be worth looking at a company like 3M. The company wants to create at least 30 per cent of its revenue with products and services that are less than two years old. To be able to do that requires a huge commitment to innovation.

People within the company that have a good idea get time allocated to develop it. Furthermore, the company nourishes failures. People are invited to share errors that are made and share the lessons with colleagues.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Frans Nauta spoke at a public sector innovation Eidos breakfast seminar on December 13, 2006 in Brisbane. A shorter version of this article was first published in The Courier-Mail on December 13, 2006.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Frans Nauta (www.nauta.org) is a professor of Innovation at HAN University in The Netherlands. He worked as secretary of innovation at the Dutch Prime Ministers office, worked with companies like Shell, Philips and founded a thinktank on the knowledge economy.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Frans Nauta
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Eidos
 State of loneliness
 Investing in ourselves
 Toying with new ideas
 Innovation drives growth
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy