Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Albanese Labor: reshaping the population to its own ends

By Stephen Saunders - posted Monday, 4 May 2026


Even in the 1980s-1990s, Australian voters were concerned immigration was too high.

Before COVID hit in 2020, repeated polls had citizen-voters wanting lower immigration. Now, you find polls like here and here with about two-thirds or more wanting an actual immigration pause, or much lower immigration levels.

How do the elite handle this? Easy - ignore voters. Or sledge them - anything but listen.

Advertisement

The elite have their 101 fibs for why mass migration is necessary and valuable. Their trump card being – voters are too racist.

Since 2019, Liberal then Labor governments have issued a dubious report for the Home Affairs "immigration and citizenship" program. The latest takes "migration nation" as non-negotiable - allegedly it boosts "productivity" and "skills". Shucks, government can't really control net migration, though there's "downward" pressure.

Nonsense. Canada and other nations can control net migration. We too could – we did before COVID. Home Affairs' false justifications would be thrashed by any half-decent performance audit.

Australian Population Research Institute (TAPRI) has researched this disjunct, between immigration attitudes of the governing classes and governed.

A 2023 TAPRI report found an educated minority (19% of voters sampled) fancied themselves as "guardians" against racism.

These tend to be morally concerned about climate change, and love mass migration, regarding those who disagree as racist. While a 33% share, who largely favoured lower or much lower immigration levels, felt "threatened" in discussing it.

Advertisement

Last November, TAPRI pointed out, the majority of voters oppose the "progressive" agenda of neoliberalism and its cultural template. This April, they reinforce this message.

Sixty percent of voters (sample of December 2024) are rated as "Australia First", with a strong sense of belonging. The rest are labelled "Open Australians" - cosmopolitan, supporting multiculturalism, high immigration, and "progressive" social values. These types concentrate among younger voters and recent migrants.

To my mind, a small governing or "stakeholder" class overrules the legitimate immigration concerns of ordinary voters, including the Australia-Firsts.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy