Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Venezuela for dummies

By Graham Young - posted Friday, 9 January 2026


The infrastructure and the oil are already there in Venezuela and they might provide possibly Trump, but definitely his successor, with geo-strategic, as well as cost-of-living options.

But it also plays a role in how Trump distances this action from the Forever Wars he promised to end. If Trump is going to get into any wars they have to be self-funding. He has a plausible mechanism for this through Venezuela’s vast oil wealth.

The cost of rehabilitation is touted as maybe $50 billion. Not a massive amount for the potential profit and it will be recovered over time out of sales with an acceptable internal rate of return.

Advertisement

That is only half of it. Unlike George Bush II he has no desire to export democracy, and he wants to avoid being sucked into administering a country, particularly with troops on the ground. When Bush went into Iraq he decapitated the whole of the Baathists, in the process giving us chaos along with Islamic State. Trump instead wants to work with whatever acceptable faction can be manouvred into replacing Maduro’s.

There are likely to be a number of candidates, apart from the current opposition.

Venezuela is a country at, or close to, a tipping point. It has inflation of 270-550 per cent. High inflation is a sign that the ruling elite has cannibalized almost all the resources and is passing on the cost of its profligacy to consumers by debasing the currency.

The situation is explosive, and many members of the elite will be looking for off-ramps. Oil gives Trump leverage with them. He’s not proposing to take all the profits from it, and a restoration of national wealth will solve many monetary problems, but this will only happen if you play along with the USA, who has the skills to rebuild the oil industry, and the ability to prevent its export.

Trump discounted opposition leader and Nobel Prize winner Maria Machado because “she doesn’t have the support”. The opposition won the last election but was fraudulently denied government by Maduro. What support doesn’t she have? She obviously has majority support of the population. He didn’t say it, but the missing support must be the army – that’s the support you need in Venezuela.

So the oil can potentially buy the military, or at least a faction within it, and who knows what deal Trump can do then? Trump has also made the Venezuelan military look foolish and impotent with his operation costing no American lives, while 41 Venezuelans at least were killed in Maduro’s compound alone. The military’s hand has been weakened.

Advertisement

Oil also influences another constituency. Trump made a promise to Venezuelans driven into exile by Maduro to share the wealth with them. While Venezuelans in the US number only 900,000, total Hispanics in the US are about 68 million and you would expect this promise to resonate with that group.

Arguably Trump won in 2024 because he won the largest slice of the Hispanic vote for a Republican ever. He will most likely be trying to top that in the mid-terms, and for his successor in 2028.

The last issue is what this does for America’s international security situation. Do China and Russia say “Look, the US broke the rules. If we do the same thing we’ll be able to deter them from fighting us by accusing them of hypocrisy.”?

Or do they say “They play dirty like us but look how effective their military is. Do we want to tangle with that?”.

I’d put money on the second. The only people running the hypocrisy line will be some useful academic idiots and fifth columnists in sophisticated Western countries where talk and signaling count for far more than action and achievement.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This article was first published in The Spectator.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy