Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here´┐Żs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia could be the long-term winner worldwide

By Peter Bowden - posted Wednesday, 24 November 2021


By the end of this century, or even earlier, Australia could be the outstanding country in the world – the most prosperous, with a way of life envied by all, setting a moral and economic standard that the world would be attempting to emulate. Why? We have access to unlimited renewable energy, vast natural resources, a stable socio-economic environment, and educated people. We are also the most multicultural nation on earth, the way of the future. All are ingredients for long-term success.

Mike Cannon Brooks CEO of Atlassian, a software company, and adjunct professor at the University of New South Wales, says:

We could power the entire world five times over from the Australian sun… It's a good measure of how large our country is, and how much great sun we have. We have a country almost designed to benefit most from the renewable boom. And we have 3 billion consumers nearby who can take our sunlight when we ship it up to Asia. We absolutely can be a renewable energy superpower. It's not just the sun and the wind, it's our great engineering force, great tradies, great financial resources, all the things we need.

Advertisement

So the future looks great for our country. Economically and socially.

Australia has recently reflected its widespread endorsement of multicultural and moral thinking in that 62% of the population recently voted to approve same-sex marriage.

Top of the list is our first Australians. They have given us many lessons, but we must do more for them. There is overwhelming evidence from Aboriginal oral history, as well as from anthropology and written history, that Aboriginal adults traditionally saw the world in highly egalitarian terms compared to their European contemporaries. One Victorian clergyman lamented in 1888 that 'in fact, it is difficult to get into a blackfellow's head that one man is higher than another. But the first Australians have problems. We, and they, must change that.

Second is Australia's egalitarianism. Its proven ability to link the world's different nationalities together peacefully: Australia is the most multicultural country in the world. The statistics are amazing. The Australian Bureau of Statistics tells us that one in every five households speaks a language other than English at home. 26% of the population were born overseas and a further 20% had at least one parent born overseas. That is half the country! This multiculturism is reflected in many ways, not least of which is its Special Broadcasting Service which broadcasts on TV and radio in 74 languages, just about every major language in the world.

The result is that Australians have not divided into the warring tribes that we see in other major countries- particularly the pro or anti- Trump United States, England with Brexit and Boris Johnson, or France with their Yellow Vests.

But there are at least two changes we need to make before becoming the world's leading nation:

Advertisement

Top of the list is our fractious political parties. We have a political system that does not serve the country well. Currently in government is a coalition of two conservative parties, held in bondage by one side of the coalition - The National Party of Australia a bunch of self-serving rural troglodytes.

The Nationals agreed to meet the county's recent global warming target at Glasgow in return for an extra cabinet spot for the party, a commitment not to increase Australia's 2030 emissions reduction target, as well as a $3 billion rail line through coal country from Toowoomba to Gladstone. Plus more investment in the Regional Investment Corporation, which offers low-interest loans to farmers.

The dominant side of the coalition, the misnamed Liberal party, also needs to rid itself of its own conservative members, unwilling to bring new thinking into our government. And then there is our Prime Minister "Do you think he lied to you?" asked Bevan Shields of The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age of the French Premier Emmanuel Macron at the Glasgow COP 26 conference in November 2021. "I don't think, I know," said Macron. Malcolm Turnbull said the same of Morrison to reporters "He's lied to me on many occasions,"

The opposition, the Labor Party also needs to reform - first to think through its purpose for existence and secondto rid itself of the shibboleths of the past,

Of significance is the overall poor election performance of the Australian Labor Party. Since 1901 there have been 44 House of Representatives elections and 42 Senate elections. In the House of Representatives elections, non-Labor parties or coalitions have won 30 and the Australian Labor Party (ALP) has won 14. Labor's primary vote fell to 33 per cent at the 2019 election, with sharp falls among blue-collar workers. It was the first time since 2001 that a Federal government in Australia won a third consecutive term in office.

Labor's reform is firstly in its commitment to the trade unions. Membership of trade unions in Australia has fallen from just over 1.5 million union members in 2016, compared with just over 2.5 million in 1976. Since 1992, the proportion of employees who were trade union members has fallen from 40% to 14%.

The Australian Labor Party was formed by trade unions in the 1890s. Currently, they provide financial and personnel resources for electoral campaigns. The 45th Parliamentary Handbook of the Commonwealth of Australia, 2017, states that about one third (33.7%) of Labor's currently serving federal MPs have worked in trade unions, or 32 of Labor's 95 membership. Union officials entering parliament as Labor members peaked in 1901, at 79% of Labor members,

There are several reasons why we need to divorce the trade unions from our political system from. One is corruption. Last year, former national secretary Kathy Jackson of the Health Workers Union pleaded guilty to two charges of obtaining financial advantage by deception, relating to the use of union funds for travel and personal items.

The history of trade union corruption is long-standing. The Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption reported on December 2015, finding "widespread and deep-seated" misconduct by union officials in Australia.

But the need for change in the Labor Party is deeper than the trade unions.

We need constructive thinking from the left. Not querulous complaints. The day of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition is long dead. The phrase 'His Majesty's Opposition' was coined back in 1826. It is no longer applicable. What we need to hear now are positive statements of what Labor intends to do if they win government- How they will make a better Australia. This viewer of the TV news is fed up to the back teeth with the endless attacks on government.

What we want to hear are the positives. What they believe should be done. I know that they are supposed to be the government in opposition, but do they always have to oppose? We follow leaders who are more positive, as textbooks and articles have been telling us for years. The Labor Party is not generating followers.

The overriding reason is that Labor policies and union thinking are not how people in a winning nation think. All of us want to make the best of our lives – to win out in the competition with others, to do better than the next man. Those on the rise, or the even larger number who believe that hard work and effort will win out for them in the long term, will vote for the party that appears to embody that opportunity – the conservative Liberal-National Coalition.

Many of us, however, this writer included, cannot vote for the Coalition. It is too committed to the big end of town, too unwilling to obey that universal moral rule: "Our duty in life is to help others" – a rule which a University of Oxford study says is universal: "Help your family, help your group, return favours, be brave, defer to superiors, divide resources fairly, and respect others."

So this writer votes Labor. Because he believes they will deliver a more moral society – a society more willing to "help others". But his vote is somewhat unwilling, as he believes that a rule, just as important, is that the winnings should go to those who work harder and smarter.

So we need to reform our political parties or even get rid of them and place our trust more in independent thinking.

Another task: Our first Australians have left us many lessons, but they suffer a lot. We must do more for them -a task we all want to take on. And which cannot wait until we strengthen our political decision-making systems. But that task, imperative as it may be, is a whole new issue.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

32 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Bowden is an author, researcher and ethicist. He was formerly Coordinator of the MBA Program at Monash University and Professor of Administrative Studies at Manchester University. He is currently a member of the Australian Business Ethics Network , working on business, institutional, and personal ethics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Bowden

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Bowden
Article Tools
Comment 32 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy