Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why we should abandon political parties

By Peter Bowden - posted Friday, 15 October 2021


There are further arguments against political parties. British parties not in government call themselves His/Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition, a practice adopted in many Commonwealth countries. Why they should oppose, instead of jointly trying to seek the optimum approach, is a product of history that has long been a question to this writer.

Read also Amy Chua 's Political Tribes. She argues that we are naturally tribal: "Once people belong to a group, their identities become oddly bound with it…they will penalise outsiders … even kill and die for their groups".

What would eventuate if we did abandon political parties? An analysis by two Australian newspapers of 50 interviews with 39 members of the Liberal party in the 2021 parliament suggests that parliaments would divide into factions (James Massola: "Who's who in the Liberals left, right and centre factions?"). The factions that were identified were three broad groupings: Modern Liberals or Moderate (Simon Birmingham), Centre Right (Scott Morrison) and National Right or Hard Right (Peter Dutton). Scott Morrison, the Prime Minister, is a "natural conservative" not an "ideological conservative"

Advertisement

The Moderates have a subgroup, Modern Liberals or New Guard Moderates, typically inner-city representatives or in the Senate, progressive on social issues and on climate change policy; sometimes terming themselves as Menzies Liberals (after the founder of the party).

Most Centre Right are members of the prayer sub-group – a sub faction that includes the Prime Minister.

The Labor party divides along strict left - right lines with some smaller sub factions sometimes allied to specific trade unions

In attempting to analyse the impact of these findings on Australian politics, this writer estimates that there might be up to eight or more positions on contentious or widely discussed issues. Under a democratic system the decision is that of the majority. Those who lose out have no recourse. But the vast majority of political decisions would have an overwhelming majority, with only the small minority at either extreme losing out. A final benefit would be a more committed implementation by the public service, who one assumes, reflects the average Australian political viewpoint, but who, at times, must at times be obliged to implement decisions with which they strongly disagree.

There is a move afoot to bring this about this change. Climate 200 is an initiative founded by Simon Holmes a Court, clean energy advocate and son of Robert and Janet Holmes a Court. It will support progressive independents at the next federal election, building on the success of the likes of Zali Steggall.

But the news media tells us that the Liberal bigwigs are urging a much-admired Gladys Berejiklian to stand against Zali Steggall at the national level. This once again, is party politics opposing the national interest. Both are competent women. We need more women in parliament, and more competent parliamentarians. But this party proposal is a loser for all of us.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

21 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Bowden is an author, researcher and ethicist. He was formerly Coordinator of the MBA Program at Monash University and Professor of Administrative Studies at Manchester University. He is currently a member of the Australian Business Ethics Network , working on business, institutional, and personal ethics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Bowden

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Bowden
Article Tools
Comment 21 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy