Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Lessons from Afghanistan

By Peter Bowden - posted Thursday, 2 September 2021


The rapidity with which the Taliban overran Afghanistan bewildered us all. It was totally unexpected. That rapidity, along with the failure of the most powerful nation in the world, together with its allies, including Australia, to win that war after 20 years of fighting has lessons for all of us. This opinion piece is an attempt to identify those lessons. But the viewpoint of those who comment on this article is also sought, for the lessons are hazy, not cast in black and white.

First, why did the Afghan forces not fight harder to defend the cities of their country? Joe Biden claimed that they had more numbers and more equipment than the Taliban. The answer must be that the soldiers' commitment to Ashraf Ghani, the President, and to their country under him, was near zero. In 2015, a survey conducted by the Afghan news channel TOLO News showed that the popularity of Ashraf Ghani in Afghanistan had fallen. Only 27.5% of the respondents claimed that they were satisfied with his leadership. Amin Saikal, Director of the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies at ANU, stated on ABC news (21/8/21) that the Ghani government was extraordinarily corrupt.

Ghani belongs to Afghanistan's majority Pashtun ethnicity like Hamid Karzai against whom he won in 2014. Russia's state news agency RIA Novosti reported that the Russian embassy in Kabul alleged that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani fled from Kabul with four cars and a helicopter full of cash.

Advertisement

A second lesson is that non democratic powers will support each other. International powers ready to accept the Taliban are Russia and China. This despite China's oppressed Uighur minority in China being essentially Muslim, located on the border with Afghanistan. The worrying extension of this lesson is that autocratic powers everywhere will support each other. China and Russia support each other. China and Russia support doubtful governments in the Philippines, Syria and other countries. China and Russia already support each other strongly with a 1997 "Joint Declaration on a Multipolar World and the Establishment of a New International Order" and 2001 "Treaty of Good Neighbourliness' and Friendly Cooperation." In 2010, China surpassed Germany to become Russia's largest single trading partner.

Afghanistan is now on its way to become another autocratic government.

The third lesson is that Afghanistan will become another anti-western, anti-democratic country, and a source of Islamic militancy, similar to Al Qaida. The country would now be the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. This is the name the country was given during the previous control by the Taliban, before they were ousted in late 2001 by US-led forces following the World Trade Centre attack, which were masterminded from the country by Islamist fundamentalist group Al Qaida, led by Osama Bin Laden.

The fourth lesson is that Islam has not lost its militancy. The Council of American Islamic Relations, that a broad Islamic concept of militancy, or jihad, includes the struggle to improve the quality of life in society, the struggle in the battlefield for self-defence or the fight against tyranny. Examples are drawn from the Muslim holy books Include:

When you meet the disbelievers, smite their necks till you have fully subdued them. Surah 47.4

When the sacred months are past, slay the polytheists (al-mushrikiin - "the associaters") wherever you find them. Surah 9.5

Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress proper limits, verily Allah does not love such transgressors. Surah 2.190.

Averroes, an Islamic philosopher based at Cordoba in Muslim Spain in the twelfth century AD, in his major legal handbook Bidayat al-Mujtahid, described jihad as active warfare on behalf of Islam. He set out the conditions under which it should be waged, and the extent of the damage that could be inflicted on different enemies.

Advertisement

Islam was spread by warfare. With over 1.5 billion followers in the modern day, Islam is the second largest religion in the world behind Christianity. Conquest and the expansion of Muslim empires did play a major role in extending the borders of Islam. Conversion was not forced. On the contrary, foreign subjects converted willingly for a mix of social, economic and political reasons, as well as the spiritual allure of Islamic thought.

That allure is seen in the work of several Islamic scholars. Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Head of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam, in a 1992 speech available on its website, Al Islam summarises the rules that flow from the fundamentals in the Quran about government:

  • The numbers in brackets are references to the verses in the Quran
  • A government is duty-bound to protect the honour, life and property of its people [18].
  • A ruler must always act with justice, between individuals and between people [19].
  • National matters should be settled by consultation [20].
  • Government must arrange to fulfil the basic needs of man: provide him food, clothing and shelter [21].
  • People should be provided a peaceful and secure environment, and their lives, property and honour protected [22].
  • The economic system should be equitable and orderly [22].
  • Health care should be organised [22].
  • There should prevail total religious freedom [23].
  • A vanquished people must be dealt with justly [24].
  • Prisoners of war should be treated with compassion [25].
  • Treaties and agreements must always be honoured [26].
  • Iniquitous agreements must not be forced upon the weak [26].
  • Muslim subjects are enjoined to obey the government in authority. The only exception to this rule is a case where the government blatantly opposes and prevents the carrying out of religious duties and obligations [27]

Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad al-Ghazālī (1058 - 1111) was a Muslim philosopher and mystic from Persia. Ghazali wrote The Alchemy of Happiness. It was a rewrite of his The Revival of Religious Sciences. Al-Ghazali emphasized that only a few have supreme happiness, which is a union with the divine. These few were the prophets. The Revival of Religious Sciences is a long book, possibly the most read after the Qur'an in the Muslim world. It explains the doctrines and practices of Islam. It is also an explanation of Sufism, a mystical offshoot of Islam. Sufism, however, does not support the thesis that the overriding moral rule is to help others, not to harm them. A seeker after Sufism must turn away from sins, love of this world, the love of company and renown, of obedience to satanic impulse, and the promptings of the lower self.

But despite these injunctions which portray a religion that is caring and considerate of others, Islam started off by military conquest.

The Muslim conquests brought about the collapse of the Sassanid Empire, Iran and Persia and the loss of the Byzantine Empire. Jerusalem fell in April 637 after a prolonged siege, Umar, the second Muslim Caliph and father in law to Mohamed, personally came to receive the key to the city from the Greek Orthodox patriarch, Sophronius, and was invited to offer prayers at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

The Muslim armies in the space of a hundred years were able to establish one of the largest pre-modern empires. The generous terms that the invading armies usually offered made their faith accessible to the conquered populations. And as it was a new and upstart faith, its administration by simple and honest men was preferable to the corruption and persecution that were the norm in more civilized empires.

There have many examples of Muslim military aggression since. Those instigated by Mohammed himself:

  • The conquest of Spain and expansion into France. Their advance was stopped at the Battle of Toulouse in 721, but Muslim armies sporadically raided southern Gaul as far as Avignon, Lyon and Autun. Charles Martel defeated an Umayyad invasion of Aquitaine at the Battle of Poitiers in 732.
  • The Barbary pirates were Muslim privateers who operated from North Africa, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and earlier, based primarily in the ports of Rabat, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli. This area was known in Europe as the Barbary Coast.
  • The battle of Manzikertin 1071 in Turkey was a major loss for Christianity and enabled further territorial gains for Islam in Anatolia. It was the first and only time in history a Byzantine emperor became the prisoner of a Muslim commander.
  • The Crusades, and in particular the reconquest of Jerusalem in 1187 by Saladin, earlier besieged and sacked by the Crusaders in the First Crusade in 1099

The fifth lesson is a simple one: The human race is extremely confused: and its two major religions, Christianity and Islam, are even more confused. The conflict between the warlike nature of Islam and its principles of justice and fair play are noted above. Even more conflicting is Christian beliefs and practices. The United States, as the most religious of all developed countries, with a widespread belief in the existence of God, treats more of its people, and of the world, in an unchristian like manner that any other country – it kills more of them, in mass murders and individual homicides, it executes more of its own people than any other Christian nation, and it causes more wars. The US has invaded nearly half the world's countries and been militarily involved with nearly all.

According to Jimmy Carter, former US President, the US has only enjoyed 16 years of peace in its 242-year history, making the country "the most warlike nation in the history of the world," This is, he said, because of Washington's tendency to force other nations to "adopt our American principles." Carter was not alone in condemning the militaristic nature of US politics

Islam does likewise. The answer? The practice of religion, at least for the world's two majors - Islam and Christianity - is decidedly against our best interests. There have been very few years of peace in either the Muslim or Christian nations of this world. And much of that conflict has been within countries with one of the religions, or between countries with opposing religions. Afghanistan was one such.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Bowden is an author, researcher and ethicist. He was formerly Coordinator of the MBA Program at Monash University and Professor of Administrative Studies at Manchester University. He is currently a member of the Australian Business Ethics Network , working on business, institutional, and personal ethics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Bowden

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Bowden
Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy