Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Uthman Badar is entitled to be a bigot

By Laurence Maher - posted Wednesday, 16 July 2014

"bigot… 2 A person obstinately and unreasonably wedded to a particular religious creed, opinion or ritual … [or] other than religious opinions": Oxford English Dictionary (Second Edition), Vol II, 185

What are we to make of the affair of the "idea" that, suddenly, became too "outrageous" for the 2014 Sydney Festival of Dangerous Ideas (FODI), a joint presentation by the Sydney Opera House Trust and the St James Ethics Centre scheduled for the weekend of 30/31 August?

Here is one approach: Can a free and open society such as Australia tolerate the expression of ideas favouring either the rejection of integral elements of its criminal law which are necessary to protect the lives of everyone, or a return to medieval authoritarianism?



The failure of the Menzies Government to outlaw the Communist Party of Australia (CPA) is an enduring reminder that (a) even sustained campaigning for the revolutionary overthrow of government can be tolerated, (b) there is a clear dividing line between the permissibility of dogmatic urging of attacks on democracy, and the unqualified impermissibility of resort to violence to impose change on the people, (c) hysteria comes and goes, and (d) Australia's abiding strength, its long history of peaceful, secular, democratic government, stands firmly against the stridency and bigotry of illiberal dogma.

Plain English/plain speaking

The particular controversial idea is, "Honour Killings are Morally Justified". Its proponent at FODI was to be Mr Uthman Badar, the media representative of the Australian branch of the Islamic political organization, Hizb ut-Tahrir which is committed to the restoration of the Caliphate. The advertising of Mr Badar's scheduled contribution gave a glimpse of his argument.

Opinions may, perhaps, differ, but this piece assumes that the proponent was seeking to express the idea unambiguously in the title, and contends that he was successful.



Dr Simon Longstaff AO, the Executive Director of the St James Ethics Centre, has published an e-mail message sent to him by Mr Badar containing a statementby Mr Badar proposingthe title of his idea.

A monstrous idea

"Honour killings" are a category of murder. Murder is at the apex of criminality. There are no exceptions.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

L W Maher is a Melbourne barrister with a special interest in defamation and other free speech-related disputes. He has written extensively on Australian Cold War legal history.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Laurence Maher

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Laurence Maher
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy