Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Flawed official narrative on indigenous population growth

By Brendan O'Reilly - posted Tuesday, 29 October 2013


While the effects of ethnic inter-marriage on Indigenous population growth is under-acknowledged, issues of shortcomings in the Census question itself are almost completely ignored in the official narrative.

The key requirement of a Census or survey question on Indigenous status is to identify respondents who meet the officially set requirements for Aboriginality. The Census question thus needs to ascertain whether respondents (a) are of Indigenous descent and (b) also identify as Indigenous. It is generally recognised that household questionnaires are unsuitable for verifying a third official requirement, which is that respondents' Indigenous status is accepted by the community in which they live.

Let's now consider whether the Census question addresses these requirements for official recognition as Indigenous.

Advertisement

The original (post-1967 Referendum) Census question (asked in the 1971 and 1976 censuses) was:

What is this person's racial origin?
(If of mixed origin indicate the one to which he considers himself to belong)

(Tick one box or give one origin only)

European Origin
Aboriginal Origin
Torres Strait Islander Origin
Other Origin

The inclusion in the 1971 and 1976 censuses of the direction "if of mixed origin indicate the one to which he considers himself to belong" clearly was an attempt to measure racial/ethnic identification, though respondents were only allowed to identify with one origin. By ticking either the Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin box, respondents were indicating a clear preference for Indigenous identity over any alternative origin, with "European" or "Other" being explicit stated alternatives.

The Census question was changed in many subsequent censuses. The current Indigenous Origin question used from 1996 onwards has now become:

Advertisement

Is the person of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
For persons of both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin mark both 'Yes' boxes

No
Yes, Aboriginal
Yes, Torres Strait Islander

What is striking is that respondents are now only asked whether they are of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin. The question does not ask about any other origin or whether, if they are of more than one origin, which one do they regard as their main identity. Respondents may now acknowledge more than one ethnic identity but the only such multiple identity allowed for is joint Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin. Dual Aboriginal and European identity (potentially far more common) is not a tick box option.

Not asking explicitly about identity seems a serious omission, given that our Indigenous population (in vast majority) is now of mixed ethnic origins and subject to increasing influence from out-marriage . A literal interpretation of the Census question asked since 1996 would suggest that Indigenous origin by itself could potentially get a tick from everyone who can trace any Indigenous origin regardless of their self-identity or community acceptance.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brendan O’Reilly is a retired commonwealth public servant with a background in economics and accounting. He is currently pursuing private business interests.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brendan O'Reilly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy