Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

www.not-happy-orica.com

By Jonathan J. Ariel - posted Friday, 19 August 2011


Sometimes the effects of toxic substances may appear immediately or soon after exposure or they can take years to appear. Determining the causes of cancer in humans is difficult. There can be a long period (10 to 40 years) between the start of exposure to a carcinogen and the appearance of a cancer.

After exposure, testing for health effects can be very useful. Medical screening of residents and water bodies to detect the risk of harmful exposure must be considered. A community wide medical surveillance program may discover small changes in health before severe damage occurs.

Organised community wide health screening in the Stockton area (and perhaps beyond) emphasising the skin and respiratory tract as well as urine tests would be a good place to start.

Advertisement

If Orica has nothing to hide it would foot this and future monitoring bills as an act of a responsible corporate citizen and would receive immeasurable goodwill in the process. If Orica has acted poorly but not illegally, then state regulations that the O'Farrell government inherited from Premier Kristina Keneally need very close inspection and perhaps redrafting

 

Finally, are there parallels between Orica and the hexavalent chromium lawsuit made famous by Erin Brockovich?

 

Yes, there are some. In that lawsuit it was alleged that Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) over the years had contaminated groundwater with hexavalent chromium in the California town of Hinkley, leading to a high number of cancer cases.

PG&E operated a compressor station for natural gas pipelines at Hinkley, and hexavalent chromium was used in cooling towers at the site to prevent corrosion. Wastewater from the cooling towers, containing hexavalent chromium, was discharged into unlined ponds and seeped into the groundwater and thus contaminated the town's drinking water.

Advertisement

Although there was some question in Hinkley as to whether the number of cancer cases was higher than expected in other counties in the state of California, and how much of a danger the hexavalent chromium actually posed, the case was settled in 1996 for $333 million -the largest settlement ever paid in a direct-action lawsuit in U.S. history. Ten years later, in 2006 PG&E paid another $315 million to settle additional hexavalent chromium-related claims.

At Orica's Kooragang Island, just like at the PG&E plant in Hinkley, natural gas plays a key role. At Kooragang's ammonia operations, hydrogen is produced from the methane in natural gas. The hydrogen is then combined with nitrogen to produce ammonia. (Orica no doubt uses hexavalent chromium, like other plants use it worldwide, for its excellent anti corrosive properties).

Six months ago in Brisbane, Erin Brokovich, the woman who fought and won the lawsuits against Pacific Gas & Electric was quoted as saying she looks forward to obtaining Australian citizenship after being impressed by our environmental credentials.

Now would be a good a time as any for her to mosey on down to Stockton, NSW and drop off her passport application personally.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jonathan J. Ariel is an economist and financial analyst. He holds a MBA from the Australian Graduate School of Management. He can be contacted at jonathan@chinamail.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jonathan J. Ariel

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jonathan J. Ariel
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy