Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

www.not-happy-orica.com

By Jonathan J. Ariel - posted Friday, 19 August 2011


According to the United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) other adverse health effects associated with exposure include skin irritation or ulceration, allergic contact dermatitis, occupational asthma, nasal irritation and ulceration, perforated nasal septa, rhinitis, nosebleed, respiratory irritation, nasal cancer, sinus cancer, eye irritation and damage, perforated eardrums, kidney damage, liver damage, pulmonary congestion and oedema, epigastric pain, and erosion and discolouration of teeth.

 

Was the drinking water supply contaminated given the plant is located close to Hunter Water treatment facilities and catchment areas? To answer this properly we need to know how much hexavalent chromium was released on 8th August and how much has been released in the past but not brought to the attention of residents.

Advertisement

As luck would have it, the health effects of hexavalent chromium in drinking water have become a major issue in the United States. In 2010, the United States Environmental Working Group (EWG) tested tap water in 35 U.S. cities and found hexavalent chromium in 31 of them (89 percent). Water samples in 25 of those cities contained hexavalent chromium at concentrations higher than the "safe maximum" (0.06 parts per billion) proposed by California regulators, but far below the safety standard of 100 ppb for all types of chromium combined that was established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Note that hexavalent chromium is but one type of chromium.

To be clear, the EPA was not declaring drinking water with hexavalent chromium "safe" for human consumption. Rather, it underscored the lack of certain knowledge and clear guidelines concerning the level at which hexavalent chromium in drinking water becomes a public health hazard.

 

In Australia the guidelines call for concentrations of no more than 50 ppb.

 

We don't know whether Orica or Hunter Water has ever breached those guidelines. Sadly what we do know is how little we know.

Advertisement

There is no dispute that hexavalent chromium is toxic. Its toxicity refers to its ability to cause harm. Damage from a toxic effect may be visible or only measurable by a test (for say, decreased lung function). The toxicity of a substance depends on three factors: its chemical structure, the extent to which the substance is absorbed by the body, and the body's (principally the liver and kidneys) ability to detoxify the substance and eliminate it from the body.

When it comes to chemicals, "toxic" and "hazardous" are not the same. "Toxicity" can be thought of as a subset of "hazardous". The toxicity of a substance is the potential of that substance to cause harm, and is only one factor in determining whether a hazard exists. The hazard of a chemical is the practical likelihood that the chemical will cause harm.

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jonathan J. Ariel is an economist and financial analyst. He holds a MBA from the Australian Graduate School of Management. He can be contacted at jonathan@chinamail.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jonathan J. Ariel

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Jonathan J. Ariel
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy