Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Cross benches key to real change in NSW

By Richard Stanton - posted Wednesday, 23 March 2011


The irony of this is that both junior coalition partners have plenty of really good ideas that could benefit the renewal of NSW.

Their problem is that they believe they are in oppositional ideological positions and that they can't be seen publically to agree on anything.

This is one of the most destabilising political arguments imaginable.

Advertisement

Both sides have been ideology-free since the end of the 20th century.

Both sides – Greens and Nationals – have created for themselves 'adopted positions'.

Much like the idea of 'strategic emotion' which is trotted out every time a politician sees a television camera, adopted positions make the Greens and the Nationals look very ordinary given that they have similar sustainability goals.

An adopted position requires a politician or candidate to be proscribed by whatever it is the party says they believe in.

There is no margin for tolerance, no shifting of position.

Within this adopted position frame the only thing that changes is the parties on each side of the house.

Advertisement

Citizens of NSW are presented with a jamboree of events and stunts reflected back to them by the media over and over so that they believe the party leaders when they both say they are renewing and changing things.

The voting process is such that the mirroring of events and stunts translates into votes for the two major parties.

Voters get caught up in the hoopla of the jamboree and are unable to extract themselves to ask serious questions of the party leaders.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Stanton is a political communication writer and media critic. His most recent book is Do What They Like: The Media In The Australian Election Campaign 2010.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Stanton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy