Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Cross benches key to real change in NSW

By Richard Stanton - posted Wednesday, 23 March 2011


In this, the metropolitan media in NSW has focused narrowly on the two-dog fight between Labor Green coalition leader Kristina Kenneally and Liberal National coalition leader Barry O'Farrell.

The result has been a spectacular array of newspaper photographs and television grabs of both leaders setting up permanent kennels in the western suburbs.

The other part of the problem, sadly, is that NSW is imagined as an initialism for Newcastle Sydney Wollongong.

Advertisement

While there is a real need to focus on the social and economic problems that have historically beset the western suburbs there are equally urgent matters across the rest of the state that have been mostly ignored by the large media companies and the main party candidates throughout the life of the campaign.

Media distillation of the campaign into a two-dog fight between Mr O'Farrell and Ms Kenneally removed any obligation to report the issues, candidates and processes that are of particular interest and importance to voters.

In defence of the media however, candidate information is not all that freely available.

Candidates do not fall all over each other in competition to provide details about themselves, their policies or their ideas for the future.

They come up with boringly ordinary slogans and grabs, photoshopped images of themselves and their loving families – tactics designed to create a false sense of belief so they don't need to reveal their true aims.

What qualifies a candidate to run for office?

Advertisement

Parliament is stuffed full of lawyers, developers, unionists and environmentalists.

There are now very few farmers or agriculturalists though the National Party - the Country Party as it was then known - once strongly represented their interests.

There are few industrialists or manufacturers, fewer still corporate business types – women or men – keen to represent the main sectors of investment in the state.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Stanton is a political communication writer and media critic. His most recent book is Do What They Like: The Media In The Australian Election Campaign 2010.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Stanton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy