Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The masculinity crisis

By Warwick Marsh - posted Thursday, 17 June 2010


On Thursday, June 26, 2003 history was made at Parliament House, Canberra when Mark Latham helped release The 12pt Plan (PDF 1.42MB). The 12pt Plan came out of a gathering of representatives of the Australian men and fathers’ movement at a Fatherhood Forum held in February of that year that advocated for a fairer go for men and boys in an increasingly feminised world.

The policy proposals were simple and commonsense: The need for a government ministry for men and fathers to promote positive male role models; remove discrimination against men; provide funding parity for men and women’s groups; and include better health funding for men with the need for a National Men’s Health Policy were just some of the issues raised in The 12pt Plan, with which I am sure most sane Australians would agree.

Mark Latham who helped release this breakthrough policy document said on the day:

Advertisement

We don't want a men's movement that blames women; we want a men's movement that works with men and women to develop better identity, better relationships, a stronger fathering role in our society and to develop win-win outcomes, where as a society across both genders we can make advances and make successful changes. So, I'm honoured to be here today, honoured to launch “The 12pt Plan” and I wish (you) every success in the future.

Those words proved prophetic in more ways than one. The men and fathers’ movement thanks the Labor Government for introducing Australia's first National Men’s Health Policy - 20 years late mind you, but we are thankful none the less. Interestingly it was only less than a year later that Mark Latham stood in the National Press Club on February 18, 2004, to make his famous speech on the "Crisis of Masculinity".

In his speech he made the following statements:

There's a very strong feeling in our society, a very strong feeling in our politics, that too much power has slipped from the people's grasp and it's been concentrated in the hands of big bureaucracies and big corporations. I very much share this concern and I want to see more government power devolve to a community level.

Mark went on to say:

Now boys very much are suffering from a crisis of masculinity. As blue collar muscle jobs have declined, their identity and relationships have become blurred and somewhat confused. We need to give our boys a new centre to their lives, one grounded in community support and mentoring.

Advertisement

David Leser in an article (PDF 531KB) in the September 2004 edition of the Australian Women's Weekly commenting on the masculinity crisis said:

Mark Latham talked about how boys’ school retention rate lagged well behind girls; how their literacy levels were lower; how they were, in disproportionate numbers, the victims of drug overdoses, road trauma and youth suicide. What he didn’t spell out were the graphic details - that men and boys were now committing suicide four times more frequently than women and girls. (Suicides among 15-19-year-old males have quadrupled since the 1970s.) Men were committing 90 per cent of the acts of convicted violence and comprising 90 per cent of the inmates of jails. They were making up 74 per cent of the unemployed. They were living, on average, six years less than women and in four out of five marriage breakdowns, they were the ones being left.

Unfortunately not much has changed since 2004; in fact many social workers and health professionals would argue the situation on the ground has just got a whole lot worse. This week we celebrate National Men’s Health Week but Aboriginal Men’s Health is only improving because the way we do statistics has changed. We not only have a Masculinity Crisis as pointed out by Mark Latham but a National Men’s Health crisis. Figures compiled by the Dads4Kids Fatherhood Foundation show:

  • men still commit suicide at four times the rate of women;
  • suicide for Indigenous men is 70 per cent higher than for non-Indigenous men;
  • rates of homicide for Indigenous men are 7 to 8 times higher compared with non-Indigenous men;
  • rates of expenditure on health care, is 34 per cent higher for women than men, in spite of the poor state of men's health. In 1993-94, $13.4 billion was spent on men's health care as opposed to $18 billion for women's health care (Mathers, Penm, Carter & Stevensen 1998);
  • death rates for men were greater than for women for: colon cancer, influenza and pneumonia, blood vessel, heart and cerebrovascular diseases;
  • after the first year of life, boys nationally have a death rate 35 per cent higher than girls. In all areas of health status (death disability, handicap and illness) boys fare worse than girls (ages 0-12 years);
  • generally more boys than girls have mental health problems, including conduct disorder, disruptive or anti-social behaviours. Young boys are predominantly the reported victims of physical violence, emotional abuse and neglect from adults and carers; and
  • more men die annually from prostate cancer than women die of breast cancer.

Unfortunately we men in Australia face another crisis - the threatened roll back in Shared Parenting which is being promoted by certain media interests, activist judges and parliamentarians.

The theme of the Lone Fathers Conference being held in Parliament House this week is the new Family Law amendments. The question is being asked, "Are the 2006 Shared Care Laws working and are we witnessing another stolen generation?” Before I endeavour to answer those questions, can I suggest we first ask another question?

This question is, "Why has the Family Law system failed in the first place?"

The reason the Family Law System has failed is it is no longer connected to the truth. As Winston Churchill said, "Men often stumble upon the truth but then dust themselves off and walk away".

In 1975 the current Family Law Act was introduced into parliament by the late Justice Lionel Murphy. The overriding ambition of Justice Murphy was to remove any vestige of the truth of the Judeo Christian ethic from our national life, in order to radically reshape the social, judicial and political landscape by imposing state regulation on the most sacred of relationships that is, between parents and their children.

There is no doubt that Justice Murphy was successful in his goal to eradicate all our links with the Judeo Christian ethic in both law and society. The Family Law Court is a prime example of his success in that he established a “new court” that had absolutely no link to the truths of our Judeo Christian heritage found in common law.

  1. In the no fault provision he eliminated the need to prove right and wrong.
  2. In diminishing the need for evidence-based procedures he eliminated the need to tell the truth because perjury was no longer pursued as a crime within the jurisdiction.
  3. He eliminated the right to trial by jury; thereby reducing the accountability of the court to the common people and in doing so made the judge a partisan actor.
  4. He eliminated the long held biblical concept that a person is innocent until proven guilty.
  5. He eliminated the rights of parents to share in the care and company of their children - but claimed the judiciary's power to determine the "rights" of the child.
  6. He eliminated the right of a child to be heard and have their wishes respected by the court.
  7. He allowed third parties to initiate actions against parents.

In doing all of the above he removed the checks and balances found in common law and due process. In effect the Family Law Court removed the concept of right and wrong and in doing so became its own worst enemy. “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” The secrecy provision of S121 denies the public knowledge of what the court does on the pretext of "protecting privacy".

It is perfectly clear that the Family Law Court has no intention of reforming its style of custody orders: it is impervious to outside criticism and is an unfit organisation to be making decisions about the future of our children. The stolen generation is increasing not decreasing. Recent newspaper reports show the courts continued pernicious activities:

  1. a mother who was guilty of child abuse, given custody of her children;
  2. a father of good character banned from seeing his daughters for seven years;
  3. a father jailed for sending his daughter a birthday card.

What then regarding the question, "Have the new amendments worked?"

The answer I believe is quite simple. “No, they haven't”. Any reform has to deal with ingrained bias against the male of the species in a lop-sided system such as ours. One could argue that there has been some improvement, but at what cost?

In talking to a friend of mine who practises family law, I was told that unfounded allegations of domestic violence against fathers rose almost 50 per cent over the first 12 months of the new amendments. Of course in the process the fathers in question are removed from their children because they are considered guilty until proven innocent.

What is the answer?

We have to again find our moral compass. What is so radical about a “presumption of equal parenting” in the event of family breakdown? Marriage is a covenant and if one party betrays the other that should also be taken into account in the application of the law. We cannot do away with right and wrong simply because we want to pretend they don't exist.

The real answer is for our society to find ways to support married couples in their most difficult times and not tout divorce as the ultimate cure-all for all marital difficulties. We need a marriage revolution and a renewal of the meaning of love.

The Australian Institute for Family Studies has declared after 30 years of empirical research that divorce is generally bad for both children and adults alike. That is something I could have told them 40 years ago as a young child growing up in a broken home.

The crisis in masculinity and the crisis in men’s health are closely related to the rampant discrimination men endure at the hands of the system and the massive health funding inequities between men and women. These inequities require the investment of tens of billions of dollars just to achieve parity. That’s why the government’s recent announcement of $17 million over four years to address the crisis in men's health is such a joke.

This equates to 38 cents per male per year, which is not even enough to cover the cost of two Panadol tablets for relief of the common cold. How is that going to solve the men’s health crisis?

Regarding the deeper issues: men have to discover their manhood again. The father wound runs deep. We have to address the issue of fatherlessness. We need healing for the masculine soul. The change of law is the easy part. The change of heart is much harder. Our society must again learn the golden rule and practice it.

This is not something that can be forced and generally speaking, it is better caught than taught. It starts when we admit that we all share part of the blame.

This change begins when we practice forgiveness with each other, and I am sure we will not run out of opportunities to do so. Just ask my wife.

Let me finish by sharing with you what I believe could be the beginning of the answer.

“A Short Course on Human Relations” highlights the importance and the power of words:

The six most important words - I admit I made a mistake.

The five most important words - You did a good job.

The four most important words - What is your opinion?

The three most important words - Would you mind?

The two most important words - Thank You.

The most important word - We.

The least important word - I.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This article is based on a speech delivered by the author at the Lone Fathers Conference, June 17, 2010 in the Main Committee Room, Parliament House Canberra.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

129 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Warwick Marsh is the founder of the Dads4Kids Fatherhood Foundation with his wife Alison. They have five children and two grandchildren and have been married for 34 years.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Warwick Marsh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 129 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy