Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why is child abuse an accepted norm in Australia?

By Chris James - posted Wednesday, 22 October 2008


When is violence acceptable?

When is violence against a child acceptable? When a child is punched in the stomach and the professional says, “that’s not much of a bruise”, the child reacts immediately to such a statement with feelings of worthlessness. In reality, the child may have experienced similar bruises over a period of years. The child has almost certainly been terrified of being harmed by the abuser. The child is probably suffering insecurity and post-traumatic stress - but if the severity of the injuries do not overtly appear as life threatening and/or there is a protective parent (other) waiting in the wings - the child is not deemed to be at “risk”.

In their submission titled From Partial Analyses and Fragmented Services to Comprehensive Analysis and Coordinated Outcomes: Responding to Child Abuse and Neglect in Australia, the Australian Childhood Foundation (ACF) raised questions about the difference between the Department’s assessment of child abuse and what was actually required to keep children “safe and well”.

Every child has a right to live in an environment that fosters his or her physical emotional, social and spiritual development, from a child protection perspective this entails stopping abuse and neglect when it has occurred and preventing future abuse and neglect from occurring. This also entails ensuring that every child is provided with a sense of security and attachment and the basic essentials including education and suitable accommodation.

Advertisement

It will require a paradigm shift to bring about this change. Have we, as a nation, the will to truly protect our children? In the meantime, should we assume that either parent applying for custody is going to be a good parent? Should mothers have more rights over very young children? At what point should the state intervene? Finally, as the courts will almost certainly relinquish their role in family disputes in favour of the scientific methods of testing, how will the public know if the best interests of their children are being served?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

38 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Chris James is an artist, writer, researcher and psychotherapist. She lives on a property in regional Victoria and lectures on psychotherapeutic communities and eco-development. Her web site is www.transpersonaljourneys.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Chris James

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Chris James
Article Tools
Comment 38 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy