Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Praise the brand and pass the gag

By David Rowe and Kylie Brass - posted Friday, 11 July 2008


Universities are publicly funded social institutions and it is important that academics contribute to significant public debates. But the higher education sector cannot expect academic public commentary to be the intellectual-but-innocuous wing of their public relations campaigns. Speaking beyond disciplinary peers to broader publics is a necessary - and necessarily risky - business.

Academics are actively encouraged by their employers to “get out there” in the public domain - disseminate research, engage their communities, and influence policy formation and public debates. Managing associations between the university and its various publics is imperative, including attending to financially favourable relationships with private companies and government organisations.

Media exposure makes good business sense, as well as being broadly compatible with the newer forms of academic outreach calling for greater community engagement. But it is also an unpredictable process, with outcomes very difficult to script.

Advertisement

Academics as public commentators might challenge orthodoxies, court controversy, and offend certain sensibilities.

Some academics find themselves misrepresented, misquoted or induced to say inflammatory things. Even those who are more media savvy and aware of the traps in going public can still become embroiled in media scandals demanding institutional damage limitation.

Universities - and not only in Australia given the global market for higher education - are highly responsive to “brand damage”, and its dire consequences for international esteem and market position.

Governing what academics say outside the academy has emerged as a key area of risk management. Accordingly, Australian universities have adopted increasingly prescriptive policies on academic public comment over the last few years.

The convention that academics should only speak in their area of scholarly specialisation, or on behalf of the university when explicitly licensed to do so, is well established.

But greater concern about corporate profile has meant that universities are now acutely sensitive to the association between the organisation itself and the public comments of its academics.

Advertisement

Since 2002, many Australian universities have introduced or updated policies and procedures for managing academic-media engagement. We found, after conducting an extensive survey, that 10 out of 38 universities currently employ robust media policies. A majority has bolstered their public comment and/or academic freedom provisions with a view to placing boundaries around the subjects that academics are allowed to discuss in public.

Keen to manage their media profile, many universities prohibit any activity or commentary that, in the terminology of their media policies, “de-position” them - that is, threaten to reduce their standing in the formal and informal rankings that obsess the producers and consumers of 21st century education.

Academics, like sportspeople, can also be charged with bringing the game (education) and club (university) into “disrepute” with key constituencies, including joint-venture partners and local politicians.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Australian Higher Education, June 18, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

David Rowe is Professor of Cultural Research at the University of Western Sydney, and author of Global Media Sport (Bloomsbury, 2011) and Sport Beyond Television (with Brett Hutchins, Routledge, 2012).

Kylie Brass is a research officer currently working on a project with Professor David Rowe examining strategies adopted by universities to manage public academic interventions. She completed her PhD, Going Public: Pedagogy Beyond the Academy, in the School of English, Art History, Film and Media at the University of Sydney in 2006. Her research interests include academic culture, public intellectualism, pedagogy, media policy, and contemporary American literary culture. She co-edited the book Anatomies of Violence (RIHSS: The University of Sydney, 2000).

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by David Rowe
All articles by Kylie Brass

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy