Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Textploitation - political correctness for students

By Ben-Peter Terpstra - posted Friday, 5 October 2007


In the world of political correctness, anti-American homilies outweigh historical facts. But there’s more to this trend as a letter by Leslie Stein to The Weekend Australian (September 29-30, 2007) points out:

Phillip Adams glibly states that “we can never know how many tens of millions of Native Americans died as a consequence of the white man’s arrival”. In this respect I agree that we can never know the precise figures. However, it may interest your readers to learn that the Smithsonian’s “Handbook of North American Indians” provides a tribe-by-tribe estimate of North American Indian size. Collectively these suggest that by around 1500, the Indian population numbered about 1,894,350.

Advertisement

Appallingly, the far-left likes exaggerating too much. Once they added thousands. Now, they speak of “tens of millions”.

It is also misleading to argue that North America’s Indians lived peaceful lives before Columbus. Context matters. The Cherokee Indians, for instance, would even employ “slave catchers”. This is common knowledge.

Though the North American tribes were not nearly as violent as the Aztecs, they were, in truth, no strangers to slavery either. For starters, several prominent tribes had enslaved 10-15 per cent of their fellowmen before the Europeans arrived.

Yet Adams sniffs in The Weekend Australian (September 15-16, 2007) that the so-called “slaughter” of Indians “got the new nation off to a bloody start”. He portrays them as “Noble Savages” killed off by the “United States of Evil”.

Granted Adams now admits, in part, that Stein was right and wrote - I quote - “my estimate of numbers killed referred to North, Central and South America. US figures remained blurred.” Alas, even this sounds erroneous. Anyway, what would drive him to use statistics from Mexico to Chile as a hammer to hit the United States with?

Phillip Adams - my guess, not an historian - is a storyteller. Take slavery, as another example. From the 1500s to the 1800s, it is true that many slaves suffered greatly in the New World. However, it is untrue, as Adams concludes, that “No nation has a more bloodstained history than the United States”.

Advertisement

The majority (65 per cent) of the roughly 10 million African slaves, after all, were sent to West Indian and South American colonies. America and Canada, by way of contrast, received some 5 per cent of the human cargo.

Yet Adams singles out the Americans for special treatment. Why is that? America was a small-bit player. Nevertheless, I am happy that evangelical Christians (from England to America) spearheaded the modern anti-slavery movement. We owe them a great deal.

Adams just owes us the big picture. But what is at stake in the “history wars” goes far beyond stories of “Noble Savages” and fake anti-gun statistics.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

45 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben-Peter Terpstra has provided commentary for The Daily Caller (Washington D.C.), NewsReal Blog (Los Angeles), Quadrant (Sydney), and Menzies House (Adelaide).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben-Peter Terpstra

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 45 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy