Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

History’s aced, now move on

By David Burchell - posted Thursday, 4 October 2007


Political journalist Laurie Oakes once observed that John Howard ‘has made every conceivable mistake an Australian politician can make, but he has made each of them only once’.

If Howard’s prime ministership comes to an end later this year, his fatal flaw won’t have been in replicating error. Rather, it will have been underestimating his opponents’ ability to learn from theirs.

Too often this year Howard has looked as if he’s fighting an election campaign against the Australian Labor Party of 2001 or 2004, rather than the ALP of 2007. Yet it, patently, has been living and learning too.

Advertisement

Oakes’s dictum came to mind the other day when it came to light that Labor’s star candidate in the PM’s seat of Bennelong, Maxine McKew, has chosen to rebuff the overtures of the “Not happy, John” movement. You know, that phalanx of Subaru owners with the little blue stickers on their rear bumpers registering their annoyance with the drift of Coalition policy since 1996.

Since - at least in the minds of the “Not happy, John” folks - that movement was credited with a shift away from the PM in Bennelong in 2004, this may seem like an odd judgment call by McKew.

Why ignore those who may win you votes? But in fact McKew’s decision follows a path consistent with every other action of Labor’s remarkably disciplined campaign team since December.

First they resisted the Government’s invitation to indulge in righteous outrage at the plight of a boatload of presumed Sri Lankan asylum-seekers early in the year. Then they refused to adopt Mohamed Haneef as a figure of pity and solicitation after the London and Glasgow attacks.

Since then Kevin Rudd has fastidiously resisted any and all of the various emotional enticements offered up to him by the fates and the Prime Minister.

Instead, he has focused on only those issues about which Labor wants to talk, rather than the issues the Government wants Labor to talk about or that annoyed ex-Liberals such as the “Not happy, John” crew wants it to talk about.

Advertisement

In 2001 the Government caught Labor on the hop over the Tampa asylum-seeker controversy.

Effectively Labor was trapped in a political no man’s land between supporters who regarded the internment of asylum-seekers as a national crime, and those whose main concern was with the integrity of immigration policy.

In 2004 Labor avoided many of its mistakes from 2001. But it then created some new ones of its own volition and effectively cancelled out the benefits of experience.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on October 2, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Burchell, a senior lecturer in humanities at the University of Western Sydney, is author of Western Horizon: Sydney's Heartland and the Future of Australian Politics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Burchell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy