Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Religious bias and discrimination

By Zelda Bailey - posted Friday, 22 June 2007


HSQ’s submission stated that its primary position was to end religious instruction and replace it with normal professional curriculum programs. HSQ maintained that the current system, conducted in schools by visitors from the religious communities, is fundamentally incompatible with the provision of public (secular) education.

However, since the Department stated that those practices would remain, the fall back position of the Society was to support an option presented in the Consultation Paper of extending the current arrangements to include “philosophical programs”, therefore Humanism.

We were delighted to find that philosophical programs were indeed included in the forthcoming draft Education Bill, 2006, when the Minister for Education announced in Parliament, “The provisions include … making sure that our schools are inclusive of their school communities in the provision of instruction in religious or other belief systems”.

Advertisement

While HSQ had no intention of “instructing” students in Humanism (the “Study of Humanism” program being educational, not instructional), future access to schools seemed guaranteed now that the range had been extended to include non-religious systems of belief and philosophies.

At this point the Christian lobby attacked these progressive developments. Spearheading the charge, Federal Minister for Education, Julie Bishop, threatened to withhold the funds needed to run the Queensland school system if the indicated changes to RI went ahead. Using fear tactics that completely misrepresented the true situation and intention of the changes, she claimed that the new Bill would open schools to witchcraft, cults and paganism.

The Queensland Christian Lobby who visited backbenchers, and emailed and telephoned others employed more fear tactics. They also apparently emailed more than 3,000 churches where Lobby contacts raised the issue at Sunday morning church meetings. The Lobby claims that in 24 hours they can reach about 45,000 Queenslanders (The Courier-Mail, May 23, 2006).

The media coverage immediately showed the success of this campaign. It reported that “the plans to widen religious education had been dumped after the Beattie Government bowed to pressure from conservative Christian groups”. “The backflip followed growing concerns among Labor backbenchers that the Government would face electoral opposition from some Christian churches and right wing community groups” (The Courier-Mail, May 23, 2006).

The fact is that all religions, including Wicca, Paganism and religious cults, under the old Act and under the new Act, have access to schools because they maintain supernatural beliefs - the definitive element of religion. If parents exercised their right to nominate any type of religion there is no legal obstacle to the students receiving that religious instruction if it is available. The only beliefs excluded from the Act are the non-religious, philosophical ones, such as Humanism.

It is hard to believe that leaders of the Lobby did not know that the real goal of the campaign was to keep out Humanists, rather than witches, pagans or cultists, from the schools: for it is certain that Humanism is the system of thought that appeals strongest to intelligent inquiring young minds as well as the minds of their astute parents. For this reason Humanism can be viewed as a serious competitor!

Advertisement

All dictatorial, dogmatic and totalitarian regimes, religious or secular, fear above all systems of belief that promote liberty of thought and a critical mind, freedom of expression, democracy, equality, and human and civil rights. Humanism represents, therefore, everything that challenges their claims to wield authority, power and social control.

Recognising the Humanist potential to challenge and undermine autocratic and authoritarian regimes, defenders of those regimes link it to the most negative ideas and destructive effects they can think of, and attach to it the worst atrocities in history.

For instance, on June 7, 2006, the deputy leader of the State Opposition, Dr Bruce Flegg (Liberal) commented in the Queensland parliament about the ill-fated Education Bill:

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

76 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Zelda Bailey is the President of the Humanist Society of Queensland.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 76 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy