Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How to become a conspiracy theorist

By Binoy Kampmark - posted Thursday, 14 June 2007


In Iraq, weapons existed (they did not); Saddam was an international threat (he was not); and Baghdad was an international sponsor of terrorism in the same mould as Iran (questionable).

Conspiracy theories can be institutionalised and sanitised. Many citizens of the Muslim world shelter their own demons, refusing to acknowledge the Holocaust (crafted as the grandest “conspiracy”) while believing in the overarching ambitions of Zionism. Conferences and work shops held to expose such a conspiracy (witness the moves of the Iranian Government in December 2006 on that score) simply give obscurantism a green light. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad drives the vehicle of a conspiratorial world view: yet another warrior in the pursuit of vérité.

Our technological prowess only reveals the extent that a conspiracy theory holds sway. Rather than liberating us, technological feats (the camera, the Internet, the radio, the television) become means of insulating us. Conspiracies gestate in a realm where reportage is scanty, verification rare. Paradoxically, the more pictures and more “evidence” that is amassed, the less believable an event sometimes becomes. In our post-modern vacuum, evidence is hollow, a package of glitz that satiates consumption but not truth.

Advertisement

There is a small step between a doubting Thomas and a card-carrying conspiracy theorist. Moon-walking becomes just as implausible as a plane piloted with precision into the Pentagon. If there are no images, it must not have happened. But if there are images, they must have been doctored, fabricated in closed settings by sinister officials.

Such reasoning is crude but consistent. All else is tampered, so we must be free to assume that our version is correct. That naturally frees the conspiracy theorist from dealing with the evidence in a scrupulous way. Often, one fraud requires the response of another. We are none the wiser.

As André Gide, winner of the 1947 Nobel Prize for Literature noted immediately prior to his death, those seeking the truth had to be believed; while those claiming to have found it, could not.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

18 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne and blogs at Oz Moses.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Binoy Kampmark

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 18 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy