Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Labor at last?

By Peter McMahon - posted Tuesday, 3 April 2007


It is still early days, but the signs say that Labor could well win the next federal election. Labor under Rudd looks good, the Coalition under Howard look tired and confused, and the media packs are closing in. Significantly, the leadership issue is at last working for Labor and against the Coalition.

And what an important election it is. As Kim Beazely said, the party that loses this election is in real trouble. For Labor it would be five in a row, and despite governing in all states, the threat of national irrelevance. For the Liberals, hardly a national party at all these days, it would mean the loss of their only electoral stronghold.

There are three main reasons why the Liberals are in trouble.

Advertisement

First, there is their own leadership: Howard is growing old and looks increasingly tired. The long-standing alternatives - Costello, Abbott, maybe even still Downer - have displayed their arrogance and distance from everyday Australia too often to be credible. The new kid, Malcolm Turnbull, seems like a better chance, but he would have to overcome the Howard-Costello legacy to establish his own style. Ministerial talent has always been paper thin in the Coalition, and now, with the leadership failing, this matters.

Second, there is Labor’s leadership: Kevin Rudd has been good, not overdoing the self-satisfaction, reasonably consistent, on the ball and orientated towards positive policy changes.

The ministers, in particular Gillard and Garrett, look fresh and ready for the big challenges, while even the machine men like Conroy, Smith and Swan look like they have their minds on the job, and not the next factional opportunity. Their federal parliamentary personnel appear almost good enough to outweigh Labor’s real problem, a corrupt, obsolete party system.

And third, and ultimately most importantly, history has turned against John Howard.

Howard was elected just as the economy was turning up, largely due to two main factors. The first was the economic reforms instituted by the preceding Labor governments. The second was the commodities boom due in large part to the most amazing economic story of recent times, the rise and rise of newly capitalist China.

Among other things, Labor’s economic reforms opened up Australia to overseas investment and structurally weakened the union movement. Both of these developments increased the possibilities of wealth creation, albeit to the overwhelming advantage of the wealthy.

Advertisement

This trend exactly suited Howard’s governmental priorities, and he competently pursued this agenda, to the cost of alternative concerns. Concerns like the environment or Indigenous issues; and to the cost of those less well off, like those not already owning a home, or needing effective medical or educational assistance.

Howard was further assisted when an extremely conservative president was elected in the world’s major power, the US. With the so-called “war on terror” a new “them-or-us” Cold War was launched (which also defused the incipient US-China rivalry, allowing the Chinese boom to continue).

Howard simply attached all major foreign policy to the American wagon, with profound effects for our standing in the region and our approach to such things as global warming. The war in Iraq, which brought the UK into an Anglophone troika, solidified Howard’s position, since Britain still wields powerful cultural weight within Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Peter McMahon has worked in a number of jobs including in politics at local, state and federal level. He has also taught Australian studies, politics and political economy at university level, and until recently he taught sustainable development at Murdoch University. He has been published in various newspapers, journals and magazines in Australia and has written a short history of economic development and sustainability in Western Australia. His book Global Control: Information Technology and Globalisation was published in the UK in 2002. He is now an independent researcher and writer on issues related to global change.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter McMahon

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter McMahon
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy