Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

'Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes' or, who guards the guardians?

By Helen Dale - posted Wednesday, 10 January 2007


Most people with any sense of the history of western liberalism understand the role of the media - the so-called "fourth estate". Allegedly, it is there to keep the powerful in check, make governments accountable, and - in an economic sense - go some way towards evening up the information asymmetry that often exists between citizens and institutions.

Most people with any understanding of western liberalism also know that, pretty much everywhere, the media is failing to fulfill its role.

Press bloopers range from the comical (wrong name, wrong person, wrong company, wrong city etc) to the deadly serious - photographs and video footage made at the behest of parties on one side of a conflict, or edited and manipulated to push a particular point of view. The recent scandal over doctored photographs in Lebanon is a case in point.

Advertisement

In between is repackaging of another news service's footage as one's own, or only attacking soft targets - the Paxtons' story comes to mind.

Stuart Littlemore QC in the 1997 B’nai B’rith Oration includes a few good case studies.

Sometimes, media types will do a Jayson Blair. Littlemore describes how Paul Barry pretended he was a reporter on the TWA 800 crash story. This involved him editing a BBC Panorama report to remove all images of the actual reporter (a Pom), inserting his own piece to camera, and revoicing it.

When reporting on the Timothy McVeigh trial in Denver, the ABC stood its reporter in front of the FBI's J Edgar Hoover building in such a way that only the letters VER were visible, leading viewers to think the story was actually filmed in, ahem, Denver.

Littlemore goes on to describe advertisements run as standard news copy, the complete failure of the Australian media to report accurately events surrounding Pauline Hanson, and the kicker that everyone hates: invading individual citizens' privacy to the point where some have been driven to suicide.

Sometimes I think Jayson Blair had to carry the can for an industry in terminal decline.

Advertisement

Now and then, individual journalists and commentators catch a glimpse of the problem, and write accordingly. In the piece I've linked, David Perlmutter makes a heartfelt plea to the "MSM" to accept its errors and respond openly, or expect to cede ground to bloggers who are simply more careful.

Most of the time, however, there is a consistent refusal to recognise that there's actually a problem. There seems to be no understanding as to why traditional news media audiences are evaporating, or why no-one trusts journalists any more.

Part of the problem stems from a confusion of "freedom of the press" and "freedom of speech". The two are not one and the same, but rather a Venn diagram with a (relatively small) overlap. It's a characteristic of the MSM that its practitioners think they represent the sum total of free speech, whereas in reality free speech is yours and my right to bag John Howard out at a BBQ, to stick up a website full of irreligious cartoons, or to tell blond jokes - without fear of a comeback.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published on Catallaxy on 20th October, 2006. It is republished as part of "Best Blogs of 2006" a feature in collaboration with Club Troppo, and edited by Ken Parish, Nicholas Gruen et al.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Helen Dale completed the BCL at Brasenose College, Oxford last year and is now reading for her MPhil in law at the same college. In days gone by she was a writer and hack, but lawyering now takes up most of her time. She blogs at Skepticlawyer.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Helen Dale
Related Links
Catallaxy
Original blog post

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Helen Dale
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy