Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The refugee problem - time for a “new order”

By Guy Goodwin-Gill - posted Friday, 3 March 2006


With 60 years or so experience now behind the UN's international refugee protection regime, it’s time for an audit. But what should be the premises of a new, revised and revived international protection system?

Beyond protection, the goals of any future international refugee protection system will surely include those which are now entrusted to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees: voluntary repatriation, local integration, or resettlement in a third state.

They will also surely include better provision in allocating responsibilities, a more sure funding base, and a greater involvement of, or access to, the political processes.

Advertisement

These processes are essential to resolving or mitigating the factors producing forced migration, and especially to firing up the commitment needed to end protracted situations.

After 80 or more years experience of international organisations working with refugees and towards solutions, we understand the basic principles and know the objectives of refugee protection. How, then, can we best achieve ends commensurate with human worth and dignity?

Two among many possibilities suggest themselves. The first involves an approach using UN resources, but without the present-day Office of the UNHCR.

In this scenario, relief and assistance would be entrusted to other competent agencies, such as the World Food Programme, the World Health Organization or the International Committee of the Red Cross. Protection would be a matter for national governments and possibly regional institutions.

The primary emphasis would be on the early removal of the necessity for flight by engaging the collective security mechanisms of the UN or member states acting under its authority.

In present-day discussions of UN reform the notion of “the responsibility to protect” is receiving a fair amount of attention, reflecting a deep-seated concern at the international system’s failures to deal effectively with crises such as the genocide in Rwanda.

Advertisement

The notion supposes an entitlement on the part of the international community to take steps to remedy a situation of humanitarian need, if the state or government responsible fails to do what is required. Its ultimate, but by no means only, sanction is military intervention on humanitarian grounds.

The notion also focuses the mind on some of the weaknesses of an international protection regime founded and constructed on early-to-mid 20th century conceptions of sovereignty. In the 21st century, it now encourages us to step out of the box which led states to insist that the UN should not get involved in costly humanitarian operations.

In addition, it proposes a fundamental rethinking of sovereignty in a way which would open up the reserved domain of domestic jurisdiction to international attention.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

Article edited by Allan Sharp.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This article is an edited and abridged version of the third of three lectures Dr Guy Goodwin-Gill gave in Australia in 2005 for the Kenneth Rivett Orations. Part 1 and part 2 have also appeared in On Line Opinion.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Guy S. Goodwin-Gill is currently a Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College at the University of Oxford. He was previously the Professor of International Refugee Law at Oxford, the Professor of Asylum Law at the University of Amsterdam, and worked for over a decade for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Guy Goodwin-Gill
Related Links
Beyond self-interest: Australia’s post-Tampa choices - On Line Opinion
Refugee Council of Australia
Refugees - we’d like to help, but … - On Line Opinion

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Guy Goodwin-Gill
Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Deals from Sponsor
Flipit.com Australia
Use this coupon code for The Iconic to get 20% off sitewide when you spend $79 or more
Vision Direct coupon code: Get 20% discount when you add lenses to frames
ValueBasket discount code: Get $8 off any order of $330 or more
Amaysim coupon code: Get your first month for half price when you buy online
Alibi coupon code: Get 10% off sitewide and get free shipping
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy