Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is One Nation trolling the Coalition?

By Graham Young - posted Thursday, 2 July 2026


Pauline Hanson is often likened by her detractors to Donald Trump. Now, I don't want to detract, but she's no Donald Trump. However, their political styles do have a few things in common, trolling being one.

It is my opinion One Nation might have been trolling when Pauline Hanson rejected multiculturalism in favour of monoculturalism. It was a word likely to enrage her enemies and titillate her friends.

As with Trump, the best way to read Pauline is seriously, but not literally. When she said 'monocultural' her mind wasn't a political vista full of identical pine trees, or fields of hybridised wheat.

Advertisement

She means there is one Australian culture.

You can come here and contribute to it, but if you come here you must be part of it, not part of something that is not Australian, and there is such a thing as Australianness.

But Labor wanted to shore-up their ethnic constituency and wedge the Coalition – why not? That's what political parties do. So, they put it on Angus Taylor – does he agree with multiculturalism?

There is a serious problem in the Liberal Leader's office that this was not predicted and catered for. The answer was not to go on the defensive, but to attack Labor.

Labor's idea of Australia is 'hotel Australia'. If you live here, you are Australian, no matter how you identify, what language you speak, what country your allegiance lies with, whether you accept our values or not.

It is not an idea that most Australians share.

Advertisement

But the alternative is not a country of automatons who all believe the same things, dress the same way, go to the same schools, eat the same food, with 2.2 kids and a house with a white picket fence.

The alternative is 'team Australia' – a group of people with different skills, different habits, but the same ethos.

Labor's multiculturalism worships difference as the essential good and demands no adjustment from migrants. Most of the Coalition's constituency, if they say they believe in multiculturalism, believes that pluralism is an essential good, and integration an end goal.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy