Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Default super and the backstop society

By Nicholas Gruen - posted Wednesday, 21 September 2005


The process would be repeated each year until the target was reached.

As "default salary sacrifice contributions" rose, employees would receive written explanation of:

  • what had happened;
  • why (in the absence of financial analysis of the employee’s individual circumstances) the target rate of savings seems prudent;
  • how to opt out; and
  • how to opt up - increasing saving faster than the default rate of increase.
Advertisement

The latter course could involve immediate further increases and or setting aside some additional proportion of future wage rises. Those responding to such approaches in the US have increased their savings rates from 4 to 12 per cent over 28 months.

Time was when we led the world in economic reform. We’ve barely begun discussing "default super". Meanwhile it’s become government policy in New Zealand - though their need is admittedly greater in the absence of any compulsory savings.

Announced in this May's budget, "KiwiSaver" requires employers to divert 4 per cent of wages into super with employees free to opt-out or opt-up. Participants benefit from a modest $1,000 government contribution followed by first home ownership assistance.

The National Party plans to abolish KiwiSaver to fund tax cuts. But KiwiSaver has won international acclaim and will no doubt be emulated elsewhere.

And it need not wait for government endorsement or enforcement. Many employers would do it of their own accord if they appreciated how much good it could do their employees - all for the cost of rejigging the administration of existing super payments.

Unions (and fund managers) could serve their members by helping persuade employers not to procrastinate.

Advertisement

Paraphrasing Churchill, rarely before in the field of collective decision making has so much improvement been offered with so little coercion or risk of harm.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This column is an abridgement of Designed defaults: How the Backstop Society can failsafe Australians' Superannuation  and is part of the Progressive Essay series on September 15, 2005. First published as "The backstop society offers super saving" in the Australian Financial Review also on September 15, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Nicholas Gruen is CEO of Lateral Economics and Chairman of Peach Refund Mortgage Broker. He is working on a book entitled Reimagining Economic Reform.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Nicholas Gruen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Nicholas Gruen
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy