Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Super way to buy home

By Graham Young - posted Wednesday, 28 December 2016


Australia wouldn’t be where it is, facing record debt, more expenses than income, and a ratings downgrade, if governments could learn to say “No” more often.

So it should have been refreshing last Friday when a parliamentary inquiry into home ownership actually refused to make a recommendation on the basis that they couldn’t do anything about the problem.

Except in this case a small “Yes” was the right answer.

Advertisement

On most points the committee was correct. It’s not so much that housing is unaffordable, as measured by repayments. In most parts of Australia house repayments are actually more affordable than 23 years ago. (In Brisbane this is by a factor of one-third).

And the increase in house prices is a rational response to lower interest rates, which, while they make houses more expensive than 23 years ago, contribute to repayments being  effectively lower.

The committee was also right to point to high rates of immigration stoking demand, combining with state and local government planning laws and taxes restricting land release, to supercharge the supply deficit.

They were also right to point to stamp duty as an inefficient state tax which would ideally be replaced by land tax.

But the one thing they didn’t talk about is the deposit gap.

Ownership rates for Australians aged 25-34 have fallen from 60% to 48%, because an affordable housing loan is only a theoretical concept when you can’t afford the deposit to buy a house in the first place.

Advertisement

But there is a solution, and it makes an appearance at 2.86 in the report, only to be then neglected – allow first home purchasers to borrow from their superannuation savings towards a deposit.

This is not a radical suggestion. It happens in Canada, for example, where one in eight of those aged 25-44 participate.

It makes a lot of sense, because homeownership is the basis of a bearable retirement, and this is recognised in the aged pension asset test which exempts the family home entirely.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

A slightly edited version of this article was published by the Courier Mail.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy