However, the case of UWA v Gray has a massive effect on the universities' position.
UWA v Gray
The facts of this case can be put simply. Dr Gray was a staff member of UWA. He (and his team) developed patentable inventions that had considerable commercial prospects. The University claimed the IP rights to the patents and the inventions and the right to exploit them commercially. The University had a statute in place that appeared to support its position.
Advertisement
Now the University's rights would seem unassailable, but the courts thought otherwise.
UWA took the matter to the Federal Court, where Dr Gray was successful. It then appealed to the Full Court of the Federal Court where Dr Gray again succeeded. In October 2009 the University sought to take the matter to the High Court but that court declined to hear the matter, which indicated it was satisfied with the decisions of the courts below it.
Hence the decision of the Full Federal Court in UWA v Gray is the law in Australia.
How did the Full Federal Court arrive at its decision?
Terms of Dr Gray's Employment
Dr Gray was required by the terms of his appointment to teach and to conduct research.
Advertisement
As his contract of employment did not specifically state that IP developed in the course of his employment belonged to the University, then it belonged to him, regardless of his use of University facilities in the development of that IP.
Furthermore, 'research' does not imply any duty to 'invent'.
The Relevant Statute
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
2 posts so far.