Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Reef hysteria

By Cliff Hall - posted Monday, 6 January 2014


Environmentalists and the Australian Greens Party are waging a massive campaign, opposing the expansion of Queensland's "Abbot Point" coal-terminal. In so doing they have created a lot of hysteria in the media. The Greens propaganda is always full of dire predictions and catastrophic events.

Their opening statements always start with "the reef is under threat". They falsely claim; the proposed dredging and port expansion will produce an unprecedented amount of spoils, kill all marine life, destroy the coral reef and ruin the Queensland economy in the process: I can assure you, this is not the case.

The Greens and their army of fanatics, have no concept of scale. The nearest coral reef to the dredge site is 40 kilometres away; a fast boat ride would take more than an hour. Imagine trying to swim that distance.

Advertisement

Project Information

The Abbot Point dredge site is wholly contained within "the existing port limits" on the mainland coastline. That's the tiny green square in the image at left!

The proposed dredging site is 3kilometres offshore. Between this dredge site and the closest coral outcrop is a wide expanse of deep-water, which is devoid of any coral. This "natural" 40kilometer wide channel is also the Great Barrier Reef's main shipping route. It can easily accommodate the projected increase in traffic resulting from the port expansion. So there is no need to dredge a new "super highway" for the coal ships.

Abbot Point is located 25 kilometres north of Bowen, on the central Queensland coast of Australia. The tiny yellow-line inside the green box (see image left), is the full extent of the Abbot Point dredging operation and port expansion. That tiny yellow-line also represents the pile of sand, which will be produce by the dredging operation. Thespoils will be deposited in deep water on the "barren sea floor", not on top of coral reefs, as you have been led to believe by the reef-hysteria.

The dredge material is made up of a mixture of silt, sand, soil, clay, gravel and rocks. The entire reef is made of this same material. Unsubstantiated reports of dredge spoils containing heavy metals are typical examples of hysteria driven green-propaganda. No surprise there.

The Greens vigorously oppose the dumping of dredge spoils inside or near the marine park. This is of little or no consequence, as most of the "Great Barrier Reef" is classed as or is considered, a marine park of some description. Disposing of dredge spoils from coastal development has been an "ongoing process" for more than a century, in all that time there has never been any reported damage to the coral reef.

This new dredging operation will take place during a very short window of opportunity, between March and June. Spread over a three-year period, output has been limited to approximately one million tons of dredge spoils per year. This procedure has been designed, to avoid disrupting the breeding cycles and migration patterns of marine life. It appears the project planners have thought of everything. Job well done.

Advertisement

Supporting Evidence

1. Hindsight is the "indisputable truth" in any argument. A total of "19" dredging operations have been conducted on the Queensland coast since 2002. In the last 12years there has been "no reported reef damage".

2. The Australian Institute of Marine Science reports, "The Great Barrier Reef has lost half its coral cover in the last 27 years, 48% of loss was due to storm damage, 42% loss to crown of thorns starfish and 10% to Coral bleaching". There is no need to panic the coral is growing back. Dead coral forms the base for new coral. This is a natural process that's been going on for half a million years, it's all part of the evolution cycle.

3. A common practice in developing the Queensland coast for the last 130 years, is to dump dredged "sand and soil" on the barren sea floor of the reef. This action has the same effect as top-dressing your lawn. Sea-grasses will quickly repopulate the new seabed; the same way it does following cyclone and monsoonal flood damage.

4. The 40 kilometre wide shipping channel, forms a natural buffer zone between Queenslands “coastal developments” and the coral reef outcrops.

5. Just south of Mackay at "Hay Point", a similar port expansion to "Abbot Point" was completed back in 2006. Seven years later and "guess what", there has been "no reported damage" to the coral reef.

6. The coal port of "Hay Point" commenced operations on the 20th of October 1971. Over the last 43years, it has grown into one of the largest coal ports in the world. You know what I'm going to say next. In all that time there has been "no reported damage" to the coral reef.

Coal

When the leader of the Greens party proclaims, "the coal must stay in the ground" it is clear to me, that their agenda is not to save the reef, but to "wage a war" on coal. Hence all the reef -hysteria. Despite what the Greens think, we don't hold a monopoly on coal. The coal industry is no different to any other business. To remain competitive, it needs to expand to survive.Coal mining benefits all Australians and iscurrently our second biggest export.With these new port expansions completed, coal is set to become our number one export earner. Coal has a very strong future with the world "turning back to coal" as the prime energy source.Japan, China and India (and others) all plan to build new coal plants. Germany a world leader in the "renewable-energy fad" is leading the way, by building 10 new coal fired stations and 27 gas-fired stations.

Conclusion

Abbot Point coal-port and its shipping operation, started way back in 1984. After 30years of operations, it has had no adverse effect on the coral reef or its inhabitants. To satisfy your own curiosity, why not fly up to Hamilton Island in the Whitsunday Passage and have a look. You won't be disappointed it's pristine.

Compared to the natural runoff (flood-spoils) produced by Queenslands monsoonal floods and cyclones, the dumping of dredge-spoils is an insignificant amount of material.In the unlikely event of any dredged silt encroaching on coral outcrops "40kilometres away"; the self-cleaning action of the ocean tides will quickly sweep the coral clean. This is how the modern reef has been cleaning itself for the last 8,000years or so.

The reef is now in good hands: "The Minister For The Environment" (Greg Hunt) is committed to improving the health of the reef by implementing a wide range of new programs, targeting "the reel threats" to the reef. After reviewing the evidence presented here you will realise that, the Greens reef-hysteria is unwarranted.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Cliff Hall is a work in progress.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy