Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is the USA in 'irreversible decline'?

By Steven Meyer - posted Tuesday, 17 July 2012


I've been hearing about the imminent collapse of the United States for 50 years. Yet here we are in 2012 and the US is still, for the moment at least, the world's dominant power. Under the circumstances you'll pardon a little scepticism on my part. On reading his obituary Mark Twain famously said "The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated." I'm beginning to wonder whether the same may be said of the supposed death of the USA.

In my lifetime doom saying about the USA has gone through three major phases. The first was the Soviet Union phase. When I started at the University of Cape Town most of the student body took the eventual triumph of that clunky totalitarian monstrosity for granted. Those few of us who thought the very notion of the Soviet Union ever surpassing the US was crazy were dismissed as dimwits.

That being said we recognised the Soviet Union was dangerous. The real worry was that the Soviet Empire, in its death throes, might ignite an all-out nuclear war.

Advertisement

By the 1980s, when it had become evident that the Soviet Union was a dinosaur albeit a dangerous one, Japan was the country that was supposed to supplant the USA. This was the era of articles in Foreign Affairs Magazine about the "emerging Japanese superstate."

Japan was no more likely to supplant the USA than the Soviet Union but this era was more fun. The Japanese were not going to start a nuclear war and they produced cool stuff like well-made affordable cars and the Sony Walkman. I am an unabashed Toyota fan. Being threatened with a better car was preferable to being threatened with intercontinental ballistic missiles.

And now we are in the third phase where China is presented as the great challenger to the United States.

Unlike the Soviet Union and Japan, China is a credible challenger. I thought the very idea of the Soviet Union or Japan supplanting America was inherently preposterous. I would not say that about China. China could supplant the USA. For reasons which I shall explain below I don't think it will; but it could.

But first let me explain what I mean by "China." I am using the word "China" to mean China under the current Communist Party regime.

It is always possible that China, like Taiwan and South Korea before it, morphs from dictatorship into a decent democracy. If that happens all bets are off. I think a China that follows the Taiwanese / South Korean trajectory of increasing prosperity and then a transition to democracy could well supplant the USA as the world's dominant country. The probability of China following that trajectory is a separate issue.

Advertisement

I don't doubt that China will overtake the USA in the size of its economy. It does, after all, have four times the population. Even with an economy twice the size of the USA it would in per capita terms be only half as well-off as the United States. It should get there at an easy canter in a couple of decades.

In the international sphere size matters. In per capita terms New Zealand has a larger economy than China but is hardly a contender for global dominance. Once China has an economy twice the size of the next biggest country it will have enormous clout in the international arena even if its populace is still relatively poor. It is also likely that by then China will have a very capable military.

But this is where matters get more interesting and to explain why I need to explode a two myths about China and the USA.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

68 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Steven Meyer graduated as a physicist from the University of Cape Town and has spent most of his life in banking, insurance and utilities, with two stints into academe.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Steven Meyer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 68 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy