Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Jingoism or a jolly good idea

By Bruce Haigh - posted Thursday, 22 March 2012


The Defence Honours and Awards Tribunal has been set up by the Australian Government to ascertain whether certain individuals, who are said to have carried out exceptional acts of bravery during active service, but who remain unrecognised, should now receive that recognition in the form of a posthumous Victoria Cross (VC).

The Victoria Cross of Australia was instituted in 1991 and is a direct descendent of the British Victoria Cross which used to be awarded to eligible Australians.

Strong claims have been made over the years by concerned and well motivated individuals and organisations that a number of Australians who performed extraordinary acts of courage during wartime hostilities and whose acts went unrecognised or were insufficiently recognised, should now, after proper consideration and deliberation be awarded posthumous VC's.

Advertisement

They include Private John Simpson of Gallipoli fame and Ordinary Seaman Teddy Sheean. Simpson and his donkey are an Australian legend, on a par with Ned Kelly for recognition by school children. Many believe that Simpson was awarded the VC. As Les Carlyon points out in his book, 'Gallipoli', Simpson did not easily fit the mould of hero, such as people like Albert Jacka, Harry Murray, Arthur Blackburn and 'Snowy' Howell.

Ordinary Seaman Sheean, aged nineteen, was a loader on the after Oerlikon gun on the Australian built Corvette HMAS Armidale, when it was attacked and sunk by Japanese planes in the Timor Sea in December 1942. Sheean refused to abandon ship, strapped himself to the gun he normally serviced, shot down a Japanese bomber and went down with the vessel.

The Australian historian G. Hermon Gill, who wrote the official history, "Royal Australian Navy, 1942 – 1945", carries the information that the ship's captain, Lieutenant-Commander David Richards, RANR(S), singled out Sheean for special mention in the Report of Proceedings of HMAS Armidale and Ordinary Seaman R. M. Caro in an account of the action, detailed the incident and the exceptional bravery of Teddy Sheean.

Recognition is due, indeed is overdue, to the former combatants being considered, for receipt of the VC by the Tribunal.

Of course we have to be careful at what is driving this push to redress forgotten recognition. No doubt there is a strong sense of righting an injustice, of giving credit where credit is due, and properly so. But we also have to be mindful and careful of recent trends to jingoism, overblown nationalism of the flag draping variety and xenophobia, expressed in its ugliest form recently by Scott Morrison, the Shadow Immigration Minister, when he accused refugees arriving by boat of introducing contagious diseases into Australia.

In seeking to anoint heroes we have to be careful that we don't airbrush from the picture undesirables who might not fit the public perception of the type of person who should be worthy for elevation.

Advertisement

Historian Peter Stanley in his book, "Bad Characters", says of the First AIF that, "It should come as no surprise to find that even VC–winners went absent, caught VD and came before courts-marshals...Other VCs ran up against the AIF's disciplinary code as much as their less distinguished comrades. John Leak, for example, who received a VC for his conduct at Pozieres in July 1916, later had a troubled time. In 1917 he burst into the sergeants' mess at Wareham demanding a drink and refusing a sergeant major's order to leave, and then went AWL twice. The second time, in November 1917, he was sentenced to imprisonment for life, an extraordinarily harsh sentence. He admitted in his defence – honestly but foolishly – that 'he could not stand shell fire'... Joe Maxwell, the AIF's second-most highly decorated soldier after 'Mad Harry'Murray, caught VD and was repeatedly in trouble with his superiors in the 18th Battalion. Even in the year in which he was awarded the DCM, MC and VC (and commissioned), Maxwell faced military and civil charges. Drunk and disorderly in London, he punched an MP in Bailleul, was expelled from a course for being drunk and neglecting duty...(he) 'grossly insulted' his colonel and made a nuisance of himself through what his exasperated superiors called his 'known excesses'. Maxwell, still only twenty-two, did little else with his life except write the racy and candid memoir, Hell's bells and Mademoiselles."

I hear you say, my sort of man, but is he the sort of man likely to be awarded a posthumous VC by a committee or tribunal? What would the public and school children make of a record like that? With the new wave of jingoism, Leake, and his sad story has been airbrushed out of our history. The Australian War Memorial, in their publication, Wartime Issue 32, Inspirational Bravery, which talks about bravery in battle and awards contains the following sentence, "In one case an Australian Victoria Cross winner of 1916 was charged with desertion the following year..." What is wrong in mentioning his name? Perhaps it is a case of 'no names no pack drill'. It seems to me that both Leake and Maxwell might have been suffering from post traumatic stress, something unrecognised then but not now, why not say that and give him the dignity which he deserves. Not all heroes can fit into or behave according to a school boy stereo-type.

But the posthumous recognition of outstanding acts of wartime courage seems to me fraught with other possibilities. If the upside is for the Commonwealth, after consideration, to give an award for bravery hitherto unrecognised, surely the logical downside is to remove honours and awards unjustly, unfairly or dishonestly conferred.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bruce Haigh is a political commentator and retired diplomat who served in Pakistan and Afghanistan in 1972-73 and 1986-88, and in South Africa from 1976-1979

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bruce Haigh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Bruce Haigh
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy