Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

India's snub a cause for alarm

By Thom Woodroofe - posted Thursday, 10 November 2011


The absence of Manmohan Singh, whose country accounts for half the population of the Commonwealth, was officially flagged in August without explanation, but it has since been blamed - officially at least - on a heavy schedule of international meetings.

But this is only half of it.

Sure, in the space of a fortnight after CHOGM, the 79-year-old was due to attend the G20 in France, a regional co-operation meeting in the Maldives and observe Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation for the first time in Hawaii before finally the East Asian Summit in Indonesia; but it is hardly any more demanding than for other leaders travelling greater distances to the same meetings.

Advertisement

So important is India's role in the Commonwealth that some have suggested that Prime Minister Julia Gillard should have considered rescheduling the event. John Howard did this for then British Prime Minister Tony Blair in 2002.

Though India did send its Vice-President Hamid Ansari, at least one Indian commentator relegated this to "sending a local district cricket team to play a Test match against Australia in Sydney".

But the reality is that for Mr Singh - and India - Australia's ban on uranium exports has now become such a thorn in the relationship that a quick trip for a multilateral forum, let alone a bilateral, is not even palatable.

This is an extremely dangerous position for Australia to be in.

Though Mr Howard reversed Australia's ban on uranium exports to India in 2007, this was quickly reinstated by Kevin Rudd once he became prime minister.

But his cheeky remark alongside the Resources Minister Martin Ferguson last week that they are both looking forward to the debate at the ALP National Conference on the issue was telling, not least because most of the Cabinet are closet supporters of a reversal.

Advertisement

The zero-sum mentality of the ban is based on the fact that despite India already being a nuclear power, it has not signed the archaic and exclusive Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty that gives five powers a monopoly on the right to atomic arms.

And though uranium is clearly linked to the production of nuclear weapons, Australia's reluctance naively disregards that India is already a nuclear-armed power and that the benefits are much wider - and greener - than often regarded.

Safeguards such as making the trade conditional on the cessation of the production of fissile material for weapons could also be embedded within any bilateral deal.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The West Australian on November 7, 2011



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Thom Woodroofe, 21, is a foreign affairs analyst combining journalism, research, teaching and community work to advance an understanding of Australia's place in the world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Thom Woodroofe

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Thom Woodroofe
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy