Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The flood levy - panic and politics do not make for good policy

By Bruce Haigh - posted Monday, 31 January 2011


The response of the Gillard government to flood reconstruction has been panic at the prospect of not being able to return a budget surplus in 2012/13. Incredible as it may seem to you and I they fear a sneering opposition.

The Victorian floods have not even run their course and Queensland may suffer further flooding, yet Gillard is announcing the urgent need for a twelve month tax payer levy. There has been no survey of damage and therefore there can be no estimate of reconstruction costs; so why the rush? There are no announced mechanisms for prioritising and auditing expenditure.

I wouldn’t give money voluntarily within this framework yet I will have to. I am being compelled, against my better judgement, to contribute to a second rate and ill thought through scheme.

Advertisement

Through her precipitate and panicky response Gillard has, unwittingly, opened up the whole question of government expenditure.

Twice I have been posted in Pakistan, as an Australian diplomat, with reporting responsibilities for Afghanistan. On my first tour I observed the country, on my second I took photographs of Russian soldiers and installations. The war is unwinnable, Afghanistan is not the breeding place of terrorism, the Taliban regime is no worse than the Wahabi regime in Saudi Arabia. Regarded as a friend of the US, Saudia Arabia has given clandestine support to Hamas, the Taliban and Al Qaeda. The Saudi treatment of women and domestic servants, can at best be described as discriminatory.

Australia should withdraw from Afghanistan, saving $2 billion a year.

Savings would be made by cutting back grants to private schools. Cranbrook a large, all boys, private school in Sydney received $3.5 million from taxpayers last year while at the same time posting savings of $8.5 million. I advocate significant cuts that could deliver $1 billion for use in reconstruction.

The cost of processing asylum seekers could be halved or better, if processing were to be carried out properly and speedily. Delayed processing does not act as a deterrent and seeking security clearances from the regimes people flee makes no sense. These delays cost money without providing any tangible benefit other than attempting to avoid opposition criticism.

The political game as it is played in Australia costs taxpayers a fortune.

Advertisement

How are the self employed, farmers, small business and others on variable incomes to be assessed for this levy?

What of the Oakeshott idea for the creation of infrastructure bonds and the Windsor and Katter idea of a national disaster insurance scheme? These and other initiatives should be now opened up for discussion and debate.

Is the Australian tax payer going to be asked to fork out every time we experience a major national disaster? This country needs workable long term strategies to deal with climate change, including a national insurance scheme, workable caps on carbon and a water policy that conserves and manages water for all into the future.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Bruce Haigh is a political commentator and retired diplomat who served in Pakistan and Afghanistan in 1972-73 and 1986-88, and in South Africa from 1976-1979

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bruce Haigh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Bruce Haigh
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy