Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Murray Darling Basin still suffering from another kind of drought

By Ron Pike - posted Monday, 15 November 2010


As we have watched the history making flows in the iconic, meandering Darling River fill the Menindee Lakes, billabongs, anabranches and then combine with the huge floods from Victoria and now the Murrumbidgee fill the Lower Lakes of the Murray and flow to sea; we could correctly assume that the long drought is over.

This is supported by the fact that most of the storages in the lower basin are now overflowing or in the healthy shape of filling steadily.

However there remains in the basin a much more damaging drought that is destroying our capacity to improve the situation for future generations.

Advertisement

It is the drought of truth and reason.

Truth, reason and common sense have been washed away in a flood of emotional environmentalism. Mostly championed by career academics and attention seeking Politicians and now embodied in a policy document delivered by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority.

The result of this imbalance is best summed up by the quote:

"Our democratic decision making process is less at risk from what people do not know, than it is from what people do know that is false."

Surely, given all the knowledge and history we have at our disposal in relation to water and the Murray-Darling Basin, we could have a plan that would benefit all stakeholders, including "the environment."

Why don't we calmly recognize the assets we have in this food bowl region at present and just agree to do the following?

Advertisement

Ensure that the first priority for any water in each river in the system is to maintain stream flow so that all stock, domestic and town supplies can be maintained along its entire course.

Then given that Adelaide and adjacent towns will have to continue to rely on water from the Murray, we put in place an interstate agreement that provides for this.

As horticultural crops are established over several years and are also high return to water input, we should make them the third priority.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ron Pike, now retired, is a third generation irrigation farmer from the Murrumbidgee Valley.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ron Pike

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy