Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Donít wait until the Queen dies to become a republic

By Mike Keating and David Donovan - posted Tuesday, 5 October 2010


Republicans are used to monarchists manufacturing myths to try to scare people away from supporting an Australian republic. We have recently written articles debunking some of these myths, including one on the cost argument and the old “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” furphy.

However, it is always somewhat shocking when nominal republicans, usually those in public life, come out and suggest we should delay making Australia a truly independent nation. We understand why they do it - most politicians would probably much rather leave the republic issue in the too-hard basket - but we still find it quite perplexing.

An Australian republic, after all, is our Australian issue. It is about us as a nation, as a people. As such, we can, and should, grasp it whenever we summon the national will to do so. Can you seriously imagine a citizen of the USA agreeing to a foreign national serving as the Head of State of the USA? Or of a German agreeing to a French national being at the apex of their constitutional arrangements?

Advertisement

Either possibility is, of course, unimaginable. Unfortunately, this is precisely the situation we have here in Australia today. We calmly accept that the eldest son of an English-German aristocratic family, who must be a member of the Church of England, sits by birthright - without regard to accomplishment - at the top of our constitutional tree. It is almost seems as if we agree with Prince Andrew who recently claimed that it was in the Windsor genes to lead. Do we really think that in egalitarian Australia? Of course not.

But, you might ask, what about the other 15 countries who have borrowed the same monarch as us? Well, it is hardly too special an arrangement. There is Canada with its French heritage; New Zealand, where knighthoods were recently re-introduced; and several colourful Caribbean states very few people could name. Are we really happy to leave ourselves simply categorised as an ex-colony like them?

Some people bizarrely claim that the institution of the monarchy provides stability. These people conveniently brush over or forget, for example, the several thousand victims of the civil war in Northern Ireland that continues to this very day. No, Australia’s stability comes from the good sense and peaceful nature of the Australian people, not from an unelected foreign figurehead.

Whatever it is that people think the Queen does for us - head of state, sovereign or grand high poohbah - we don’t need her to do it for us anymore. We have an abundance of talented, capable and deserving Australian men and women who can look after Australia excellently in any role we require filled; no need to tremble, no need to equivocate, no need for a learner period, no need for any more delay.

So, why do we hear the plaintive call to “wait until the Queen dies” (or maybe abdicates)?

Some would say, because many of us respect the current monarch. That’s true, but is that really a reason? This is not about an individual person, the Queen, at all. It’s about the absurd institution and its absolute irrelevance to our Australian identity and ethos in the year 2010.

Advertisement

Some would argue that it will be easier to win the republic discussion without the Elizabeth Windsor factor. Again, that’s probably true, but still a complete cop-out. Why are we always opting for the easy option? Are we trying to convince ourselves that if Charles or William, or whoever else was monarch, that the royal institution would represent our national aspirations less well? Or are we saying that we think we know them and their foibles and are not too keen on them personally? None of these people can add to our sense of Australian identity or hope to be able to unambiguously represent us on the national or world stage. They’re English - we are Australian - it’s simple; a total no-brainer.

According to the press, the Queen was amazed that we voted “No” in 1999, Prince Philip said we were “bloody mad” when told the result and Prince Charles has said that Australia should become a republic. As for the younger royals, William Wales has spent three days in Australia in the last 27 years and quite happily describes himself as English through and through while he wanders around the world promoting English football, often in direct opposition to Australian national interests (e.g. 2018 Football World Cup hosting rights). It shouldn’t matter to us Australians, but in case you were worried, frankly, the Windsors couldn’t care less if Australia was a republic or not.

The point is, philosophically, it makes no sense for us to delay.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Punch on October 4, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

59 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Major General Mike Keating AO has been Chair of the Australian Republican Movement since 2006. He was born in Albury, NSW in 1945 and graduated from Duntroon Military College in 1967, being awarded the Sword of Honour. He was commissioned as a Lieutenant in the Royal Australian Infantry Corps and saw operational duty in South Vietnam. He was promoted to the rank of Major General in June 1994 and served in that rank as Commander 1st Division, Commander Training Command (Army) and Head, Strategic Command, Australian Defence Headquarters in 1999 and 2000 during the major ADF deployment to East Timor. He was appointed a Member of the Order of Australia in June 1993 in recognition of his service as Commander 3rd Brigade and as an Officer in June 2000 for distinguished service to the ADF and to the Australian Army in high level command and staff appointments. Major General Mike Keating retired in January 2001 after 37 years service. He now lives in Brisbane and also works part-time as a mediator with the Queensland Department of Justice.

David Donovan, 40, is the editor of the online journal of Australian identity and democracy, www.independentaustralia.net, and a vice chair of the Australian Republican Movement.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Mike Keating
All articles by David Donovan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mike KeatingMike KeatingPhoto of David DonovanDavid Donovan
Article Tools
Comment 59 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy