Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Putting NAPLAN literacy testing to the test

By Elizabeth Grant and Fiona Mueller - posted Monday, 2 August 2010


The major drawback of these tests, however, is the random selection of aspects of grammar and punctuation. Whereas all of the spelling questions are placed together, there appears to be no logical order to the other questions. For both Year 3 and Year 5 students, for example, a question testing the comparative versus the superlative is followed by a question asking students whether or not to capitalise a proper noun. The lack of order means that teachers and their students are unlikely to be able to use the tests as teaching tools as there is no systematic assessment of particular aspects of grammar and punctuation. How is this, then, a collection of “rich diagnostic data”?

Some test items use misleading terminology. In the Year 3 test of language conventions, for example, item 34 asks “Which sentence is correct?” Possible choices are:

a) The children on the oval playing football.
b) The children playing football on the oval.
c) The children were playing football on the oval.
d) The children who were playing football on the oval.

Advertisement

The answer is c). This question must be testing students’ knowledge of what constitutes a complete sentence because three of the four responses are sentence fragments. Yet, the question itself asks “Which sentence is correct?” There is only one sentence here.

The new Australian curriculum places a strong emphasis on the development of skills in editing and proofreading. The structure of the NAPLAN tests of language conventions gives students little opportunity to demonstrate such skills. For example, in the items that require students to insert commas to corral words, phrases or clauses, a number of possible locations are given. Why? In editing their own work, students should have the capacity to identify not only which punctuation is required, but where it should be placed in a sentence.

According to one lecturer in language education, “In order for student to be able to discuss specific grammatical concepts and language use within a text, it is advantageous to provide them with a standard grammar vocabulary. The language for talking about, and describing, language is referred to as ‘metalanguage’. Developing students’ metalanguage will better equip them to engage in text and grammar analysis and dialogue, leading to the improvement of the structural aspects of their written texts, In order to develop students’ metalanguage, the teacher needs to use the terminology consistently an regularly, whenever text grammar discussions take place (‘Grammar knowledge and students’ writing’, in Curriculum Leadership Journal, Vol 5, Issue 24, July 2007).”

The Education Review article by ACARA also claims that “Teachers use the results of common testing to identify weaknesses and strengths in individual students and within groups. This feedback enables teachers to focus their teaching and learning programs in the future.” If the ultimate goal to support the development of students’ skills in the application of language conventions, there is no room for error in the collection of what ACARA calls “rich diagnostic data”. The design and content of the tests must be clear, accurate and useful. This is not the case at present.

In establishing a stand-alone test of language conventions, the education authorities are identifying spelling, grammar and punctuation as essential aspects of language acquisition. A valid test instrument for students in this area must be absolutely clear in its structure and purpose. It must set high standards, complement the expectations of the reading and writing tests, and provide the best possible guidance for teachers.

An analysis of the 2010 NAPLAN tests of language conventions for Years 7 and 9 will be provided in a subsequent article.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Elizabeth Grant BA, Grad Dip (TESOL), MA (TESOL) worked with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for over 20 years before moving to Seoul and then Shanghai to teach English as a Second Language. Since 2002, she has been based in Canberra, co-ordinating and teaching English language and communication skills programs for university students. In 2005, she participated in a major research project to investigate undergraduates’ perceptions of the extent to which their experience of English in K-12 prepared them for their tertiary courses. Liz’s professional experience in Europe, Asia and Australia has made her very aware of the value of language awareness training for both native and non-native speakers of English.

Dr Fiona Mueller is a teacher of English and foreign languages and a former Head of ANU College at the Australian National University. In 2016-2017, she was Director of Curriculum at the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). She is particularly interested in the history of education, international education, single-sex schooling and K-12 curriculum design.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Elizabeth Grant
All articles by Fiona Mueller

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy