Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Few familiar with Rudd are shocked by his exit

By Scott Prasser - posted Monday, 28 June 2010


The sudden fall from grace of Kevin Rudd, his inability through lack of support to even contest the leadership, and the willingness of the Labor Party to dump a leader are unprecedented in Australian politics.

Indeed, Rudd's demise amounts to a dismissal almost as significant as governor-general John Kerr's dismissal of the Whitlam government in 1975, except that this time the execution was carried out by the Labor caucus on one of their own.

Rudd's end and the way it occurred is significant because it shows how fast moving politics has become in Australia, driven by the media and polling.

Advertisement

It is significant that the Labor Party, once tolerant of unsuccessful leaders, is now so quick to sacrifice a prime minister who falters.

Rudd's end is also significant because he came to power on a wave of irrational hysteria from the Australian electorate and criticisms of the Howard government when Rudd and Labor had few real policy alternatives, beliefs and frameworks to offer in its place.

The real surprise for some who knew, experienced and observed Rudd when he worked for the Goss government in Queensland is not that Rudd has gone as suddenly as he came.

No, the surprise is that the increasingly questionable performance of Rudd as a prime minister and his government came as such a surprise to everyone else: the electorate, large sections of academe and other Canberra observers.

I warned about Rudd's “ruthless style” as head of the Office of Cabinet in Queensland under the Goss Labor government in The Australian on January 11, 2007.

Look to how he operated in Queensland and you will understand what he would be like in “Canberraland” as prime minister: that was my message.

Advertisement

The script was there for all of us to see.

The insistence on control, the centralisation of decision-making, the impatience, the demands for more and more activity, the strains on the decision-making processes, the upsetting of ministers, the rush to implement without experience or knowledge or thought about how, were the very problems that weakened the Goss government and led to its unexpected rejection from office.

The script was there, but too few were willing to read what had happened in Queensland and to understand Rudd's real capacities and his limitations.

In the rush to kick out John Howard, to denigrate his abilities as a person and the achievements of his government, Rudd's fatal flaws and his record were not just overlooked but deliberately ignored.

As argued by some analysts before he became prime minister, we had no experience of Rudd as a minister in government and, just as importantly, neither did he.

This was not just an error by the electorate but a real mistake by the Labor Party.

His work and life experiences were not typical for the Labor Party, where negotiation rather than commands, compromise rather than stubbornness, personalities and friendships rather than utility and value, are what count. And the way the Labor Party deserted him this week shows this.

Rudd never really understood the Labor Party nor the Labor Party him. Look at the way he sent a staff member as recently as this week to talk to the back bench about his prospects.

Similarly, we should not have been surprised by the Rudd government's policy failures. These were not just ones of implementation, as most suggest.

They were failures to be innovative, to bring fresh ideas and leadership. Rudd had never been big on new policy ideas, despite expansive rhetoric such as the “education revolution” that was low on content. Where has he ever shown any policy innovation in relation to foreign affairs?

His proposals in that area floundered just a couple of weeks ago. He was even a born-again fiscal conservative, though not practised in office.

He did not have an original idea in his platform. The tax reform was exaggerated and turned only on class politics. Compare this with others such as Gough Whitlam, Paul Keating, Bob Hawke and even Howard who often led debate on so many issues.

Just what will the Rudd government be remembered for? Nothing but policy failure and a failure to exercise appropriate personal and political skills to develop an agenda for real policy change.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Weekend Australian on June 26-27, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Scott Prasser has worked on senior policy and research roles in federal and state governments. His recent publications include:Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia (2021); The Whitlam Era with David Clune (2022), the edited New directions in royal commission and public inquiries: Do we need them? and The Art of Opposition (2024)reviewing oppositions across Australia and internationally.


Other articles by this Author

All articles by Scott Prasser

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Scott Prasser
Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy