Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

'Greening' our children: screens and ads donít help

By Barbara Biggins - posted Thursday, 27 May 2010


Children are spending increasing amounts of time with screens - up to four hours a day with TV, DVDs, videogames and the Internet. A concern shared by some, is the increasing exposure of children to commercialised content. What’s the impact of all those ads, product placements and marketing pressures?

We’ve long known that young children have great difficulty in coping with advertisements, as they don’t understand selling intent. In recent years we have learnt from Fine and others (Fine, C (2007) Vulnerable minds? “The consumer unconcious and the ethics of marketing to children” Res Publica; and Nairn, A and Fine C (2008) “Who’s messing with my mind? International journal of marketing) that even older children, who have increased understanding, are still susceptible to the commercial messages that tell them that to be a success, they have to buy: buy this, wear that, listen to this, play with …, watch …

We’ve learnt that education about techniques alone is not enough. Marketing typically targets portions of the brain that govern emotion rather than cognition, and while knowledge about advertising techniques can lead to scepticism about marketing, it does not necessarily affect actual consumer behaviour.

Advertisement

So we have a situation where children are being socialised into consumption from an early age, and we are unable to provide them with effective defences.

If we couple this problem with the outcome of children’s increased hours with media - a lack of contact with their outside world, and of exploration of their physical environment - it’s no wonder that some are increasingly concerned about how we will be able to engage the young in real concern about their environment and worse still, to be supportive of the changes in lifestyle and consumption patterns that will be required for environmental sustainability.

An article in the March 2 issue of The Solutions Journal by US writers Tim Kasser, Tom Crompton, and Susan Linn sums up the issue like this:

While not typically seen as an “environmental issue,” those concerned about the environment should be sobered by the increasing commercialization of childhood, as the same generation of children, that is being encouraged to prioritize wealth, consumption, and possessions, is the same generation that, if current trends continue, will need to drastically reduce its consumption patterns so as to prevent further global climate disruption, habitat loss, and species extinction … (Kasser, Tim et al 2010)

Further they argue that:

By tackling the inflow of such materialistic messages, environmental organizations can work to diminish the values known to promote ecologically degrading attitudes and behaviors, as well as other personally and socially problematic outcomes.

Advertisement

The authors propose that:

… if the environmental movement is to reach its goals, it must directly address the problem of materialistic values and the means by which they are encouraged in society. Of the many possible solutions that are available towards this end, we suggest that one of the most promising approaches is to reduce children’s exposure to commercial marketing …. For these reasons, coalitions of civil society organizations could promote the removal of commercial messages from children’s environments. One place to start would be in the home …

These are goals that I, and many others who work with children, would support.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

27 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Barbara Biggins OAM, is the Hon CEO of Australian Council on Children and the Media. The ACCM is a not-for-profit national community organisation whose mission is to support families, industry and decision makers in building and maintaining a media environment that fosters the health, safety and wellbeing of Australian children. Its patrons are Baroness Susan Greenfield and Steve Biddulph. Barbara also served as the Convenor of the federal Classification Review Board 1994-2001.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Barbara Biggins

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 27 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy