Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia stuck in the middle

By Peter McMahon - posted Monday, 12 April 2010


There is a lot of talk right now about Big Australia and the boom that will just go on and on and how we’ll all be rich. And how we need ever more people to fill the skills gap and achieve optimal economies of scale and even avoid invasion.

All this ignores a whole raft of problems currently emerging - like global warming, peak oil, a shaky finance system yet to be fixed, and overall lower growth rates due to the debt caused by the global economic crisis - that will radically impact on Australia’s future prospects.

But here I want to comment on another issue: the coming contest for global primacy between the US and China. This problem is of the utmost importance to Australia because we rely on the open world trading and investment system guaranteed by Washington and our most important trading and increasingly investment partner is China. Furthermore, although we live in the Anglo-American cultural sphere, geography puts us in China’s sphere of influence.

Advertisement

Right now the US and China are entangled in a relationship full of contradictions. Economically they are interdependent as China has soaked much of the huge US debt and so the Chinese want the dollar to stay high. Also Americans want to continue to buy cheap Chinese goods and the Chinese want them to keep buying them.

But the Chinese have already indicated that they do not play the western-style economic game. The Communist government remains in control of economic development and they are willing to flex their muscles for economic gain. The Stern Hu incident, when the government took on one of the world’s largest mining companies, Rio Tinto, has sent shockwaves around the corporate world.

The US faces huge economic problems, as indicated by sovereign debt and unemployment being so high. Militarily the US will begin to go into decline as the economy weakens; by contrast, under current conditions China’s economy and military spending will continue to grow. It has been projected that the two militaries could achieve rough military parity around 2020 but the volatile global economy could change that either way. The Chinese have announced a slowing down of defence spending just recently, but it is believed that they underestimate official military spending statistics anyway. The Rudd government’s recent Defence White paper was focused on the rise of China as a military threat, much to Beijing’s annoyance.

In fact, the US and China appear to be already fighting a low intensity war in cyberspace as the Chinese try to steal American technology and disrupt cyber-systems. They in turn seem to think that the US is using entities like Google to attack China.

Both the US and China are chauvinistic societies believing absolutely in their own ways of life and ultimate destiny. American exceptionalism, as it is called, claims that the US is a special nation outside the usual laws of rise and fall. Behind this is a nebulous but real sentiment that the US is God’s own country and destined for greatness. As the US heads into decline and its global hegemony wanes, we can expect a rise in the tenor of patriotism and sabre-rattling from important sections of American society. If that translates into political force, a military posture that makes Bush II’s aggressive stance look pale by comparison could arise.

Furthermore, both the US and China have launched strategies to achieve and maintain superiority in the great global energy contest. They both know cheap oil is running out and they both want to control what’s left and the alternatives like gas. In addition, both have been backwards on developing policies to counter global warming; China showing its reluctance to accept super-power responsibility at Copenhagen.

Advertisement

China has always considered itself, with some justification, to be the centre of the world. After the humiliation of the 19th and early 20th centuries and its withdrawal from global affairs during the mid-20th century, China is most definitely back. It is expressing a newfound confidence in its role in the world, from cultural expression to going into space.

There are ready-made flash-points if either the Chinese or the Americans want to try their luck, most obviously Taiwan. Just recently China objected to the sale of more advanced military equipment by the US to Taiwan. Even a serious stand-off, let along some shooting, would clobber the world economy, and likely flatten Australia’s exports.

Perhaps most worryingly, a declining US and shaky China (if one of several troublesome issues was to blow up and threaten internal stability) might both be looking for a little aggro as their ruling elites scramble to keep control.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Peter McMahon has worked in a number of jobs including in politics at local, state and federal level. He has also taught Australian studies, politics and political economy at university level, and until recently he taught sustainable development at Murdoch University. He has been published in various newspapers, journals and magazines in Australia and has written a short history of economic development and sustainability in Western Australia. His book Global Control: Information Technology and Globalisation was published in the UK in 2002. He is now an independent researcher and writer on issues related to global change.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter McMahon

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter McMahon
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy