Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The politics of climate change in Australia

By Keith Suter - posted Friday, 18 December 2009


The circuit breaker

The Club of Rome has said that the 20th century will be known as the “century of the economy” because it was in that century humankind worked out how to achieve economic growth. The 21st century will be called the “century of the environment” because environmental problems will be so big they will force themselves upon humankind.

The climate change issue will not therefore go away. No matter what happens with the Kyoto/Copenhagen process, environmental problems will remain.

Australian public and political opinion is very volatile, with a short concentration span. (A good example of short-term memory loss is the introduction a decade ago of the Australian Goods and Services Tax (GST)/ Value Added Tax (VAT). It had long been Australian Treasury policy to have one - it was necessary to get the politicians to understand this. The introduction had been attempted in the early 1980s by the then Labor Government’s Treasurer Paul Keating and it had been defeated by public opinion within his own Labor Party. He dropped the idea. The GST idea was revived in 1993 by a short-lived Leader of the Liberal Opposition (John Hewson). But he was soundly defeated in an “un-losable” election by the then Prime Minister Paul Keating who shamelessly argued against it! He (successfully) counted on Australians forgetting that he had previously advocated one. When John Howard then became the new Leader of the Opposition he promised not to revive the GST proposal. He said it was a dead issue. But he then introduced it when he became Prime Minister after defeating Paul Keating in 1996 and it became his most notable domestic policy change.)

Advertisement

A fresh round of natural disasters would force politicians once again to be more active on this subject. The disasters will be the circuit breaker. Politicians will again be scrambling to find some “solutions”.

The Australian climate change debate is not over.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Keith Suter is a futurist, thought leader and media personality in the areas of social policy and foreign affairs. He is a prolific and well-respected writer and social commentator appearing on radio and television most weeks.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Keith Suter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Keith Suter
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy