Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australian universities must take the on-line learning lead

By Fiona Stewart - posted Saturday, 31 March 2001


It was General Electric chairman Jack Welch who once said: "When the rate of change outside exceeds the rate of change inside the end is in sight". While Welch wasn't speaking of universities, he might well have been since it's this predicament that universities, globally, find themselves facing.

While the new economy may be hype to many, to those in the "business of learning" - a sector that by 2010 will be worth $US4.5 trillion ($8.9 trillion) - it represents a massive opportunity. Rising to the challenge is the most important task of any smart country.

Yet it's our universities - those which should be showing leadership - which are complaining the most. With their self-acknowledged inability to perform due to a lack of government funding, these once-respected institutions are looking decidedly worn.

Advertisement

The debate on the decline of standards is evidence enough. So is the undercurrent of academic hostility to the commercialisation of knowledge - intellectual property - and to globalisation through a shift to online learning.

Ironically, perhaps, it's these latter two demands that could prevent Australia's "sand stones" and "green fields" from becoming the archaeological digs of the future.

It's now commonplace to acknowledge that the new knowledge society has radically altered the way knowledge is produced, valued and sold. While business has been faster to catch on, change in universities has been a pocket approach.

Yet where movement is afoot, exciting times are ahead. Importantly, these instances show the direction of the road ahead.

Take Deakin Australia. As the commercial arm of Deakin University, this corporate university provides learning to an impressive list of blue-chip clients in Australia and around the world. Enrolling companies rather than individual learners, Deakin Australia's enrolment of more than 40,000 learners has already superseded its traditional counterpart.

But it's the nature of what Deakin Australia delivers that shows what it takes to be successful as a new economy operator.

Advertisement

With the cost of training now reconfigured as an investment in learning, Deakin Australia is indicative of thousands of corporate universities the world over which provide customised, workplace-based learning that is modularised, immediately applicable and directly relevant to the skill set of the knowledge worker. Rather than trashing their brand through public declarations of poverty and staff discontent, non-traditional providers are busily developing real world solutions and increasing their brand vibrancy. It's this vibrancy that has technology at its heart.

Central to the learning demands of a knowledge society is the need to access learning at one's own pace and place. This could mean learning at lunch time, at home tonight, or in 15-minute segments before breakfast each day.

It's also essential that the learning is "just for me". Moving beyond the pedagogically inefficient one-to-many lecture style of old, it's the flexibility of e-learning that's now seen as the way of the future.

Not only is e-learning scalable and able to reach distant people, it's the only way of updating learning in the shortest time possible. A two-year wait for a new course has become anathema in a society that needs to learn new knowledge weekly and to apply it daily.

For these reasons, e-learning is the third generation of education. The ability of our universities to reinvent themselves for this challenge deserves serious attention.

In the absence of global Australian education brand names, our universities - and our other non-traditional providers - have their work cut out. That's why they need to be innovative in securing market share. Corporate universities are one model but we also need others.

Take Labor's policy model of an Australian online university portal. This one-stop-shop for the online learning shopper may be useful. But it will hardly be efficient if it offers 20-plus versions of Marketing 101.

Using new technology to do the same old thing is neither innovative nor desirable. Instead, the real challenge is to decide what Australian education should be, and how many universities we should have to achieve it.

For example, are we to be the "no frills" provider of learning? Should an OzEd portal be the deliverer of a "fair deal"? Or of egalitarian/democratising products and services? There are even options such as "value for money", "greater employability potential" or "the very latest in skills upgrades".

In a knowledge society, it's new ideas such as these that are called for. With our future at stake, we can't afford not to think it up.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published in the Australian Financial Review on 21 March 2001.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Fiona Stewart is Director of Realworld Research and Communications and is a consultant to corporations, universities, TAFE and schools in educational futures and e-learning. Fiona Stewart is co-author (with Philip Nitschke) of Killing Me Softly: Voluntary Euthanasia and the Road to the Peaceful Pill.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Fiona Stewart
Related Links
Fiona Stewart's homepage
Photo of Fiona Stewart
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy