Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Real tax reform: a love letter to Ken Henry

By John Passant - posted Monday, 7 December 2009


Dear Ken

I am pleased to be able to make a submission to your Inquiry into Australia’s Future Tax System.

We live in a society divided into classes.

Advertisement

The exploitative capital accumulation system means that our bosses expropriate the value we workers create and return a small amount to us in the form of wages.

This surplus value is divided up between the capitalist class and the state in the form of profit, rent, interest, dividends, royalties and government revenue.

Most tax debate in our country reflects this basic class division, but from the point of view of the bourgeoisie.

Efficiency, equity and simplicity are merely competing and overlapping views among the capitalist class and those who support them about how to best fund the State and ensure the exploitative system still runs as smoothly as possible.

This is in reality the debate between neoliberalism and neoliberal Keynesianism.

It was a Minister in a feudal government in France who summed up the dilemma capitalism faces. As Jean Baptiste Colbert said: “The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to get the most feathers with the least hissing.”

Advertisement

I prefer a different approach, which will involve lots of hissing from the ruling clique.

Like Dennis Healy, former British Labour Chancellor in the 1970s, I would “squeeze the rich until the pips squeak”.

Actually the more the state extracts from the surplus value we create but the ruling elite steal, the slower the process of capital accumulation becomes and thus the longer the boom and slump and then depressionary cycles take to impose themselves on the economy. (This is true if the spending goes into unproductive or waste areas like armaments.)

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

First published in the author's blog, En Passant, on April 26, 2009



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Passant is a Canberra writer (www.enpassant.com.au) and member of Socialist Alternative.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Passant

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Passant
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy